[02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 43 ( DB ) : uniplas india ltd vs state : mere breach of contract would not give rise to an offence of cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention was alleged right at the beginining of transaction [02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 97 : sarojinidevi A rep by power agent vs R Arumugam : code of civil procedure and civil rules of practice permits appearance of non – advocate to conduct litigation [02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) CTC 187 : vijay singh vs shanti devi SC : once ex parte decree is set aside , parties would be relegated to position at which they were when ex parte decree was passed ( order 9 rule 13 CPC 1908 ) [02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 1996 (9) SCC 74 : secretary , Hailakandi bar association vs state of assam : Belated apology cannot be accepted in a contempt proceedings , because it is presumed not been given in good faith
[02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 43 ( DB ) : uniplas india ltd vs state : mere breach of contract would not give rise to an offence of cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention was alleged right at the beginining of transaction
[02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2019 (5) CTC 97 : sarojinidevi A rep by power agent vs R Arumugam : code of civil procedure and civil rules of practice permits appearance of non – advocate to conduct litigation
[02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 2017 (6) CTC 187 : vijay singh vs shanti devi SC : once ex parte decree is set aside , parties would be relegated to position at which they were when ex parte decree was passed ( order 9 rule 13 CPC 1908 )
[02/04, 10:41] Vinothpandian: 1996 (9) SCC 74 : secretary , Hailakandi bar association vs state of assam : Belated apology cannot be accepted in a contempt proceedings , because it is presumed not been given in good faith
