You may also like...
-
Item no 30, before Hon’ble Justice p t Asha Section 34 application was filed challenging an award. Based on the same award an execution proceeding was initiated before Kanchipuram Distrixt Court which was subsequently stayed by the High Court. Upon verification and contradictions with the Award copy, the Arbitrator was directed to be present before the Court. Also notice was issued by Justice Asha to the Bar council of Tamil Nadu directing them to verify enrolment details of the Arbitrator who passed out in 2013z The Arbitrator was present before the Court today and stated that this is a fraudulently obtained award and that he did not appear as a arbitrator at any point of time. The Hon’ble judge directed the Arbitrator to file an affidavit and the matter is posted to 9.01.20. Petitioner counsel- S.Sivaraman
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 7, 2020
-
-
HC wants to know quality of liquor sold in Tasmac shops–Justices M. Sathyanarayanan and Anita Sumanth also wanted to know whether lists containing the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) for different kinds of liquor were displayed in all retail shops run by Tasmac across the State as required under the Code of Prevention and Detection of Fraudulent Acts in Tasmac of 2014.
by Sekar Reporter · Published May 29, 2020