Follow:
- Next story Setting aside the Thanjavur collector’s order which rejected an arbitration application on the ground that it was filed outside the prescribed period, the Madras high court held that there is no time limit specified for applying before the arbitrator under the National Highways Act, 1956. Justice S S Sundar observed that even otherwise if the Limitation Act, 1963, was applied in the case, the period prescribed under section 137, which is applicable in the present case, the appeal was filed well before time. “From the facts of the case in hand, this court is satisfied that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed time. Hence, this court has no hesitation to hold that the order passed by the collector dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation is not only illegal on accounts of the judgements of the earlier division bench of this court, but also by accepting the case of the collector regarding application of Limitation Act,” observed the judge.
- Previous story The Madurai Bench of Madras High Courtheld that registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim IGSTrefunds, irrespective of the circular on clarifications on exports related refund issues (Circular No.37/2018-Customs, dated 09.10.2018). The ruling was made by a single bench consisting of Justice M.Govindaraj, in the case of M/s.Precot Meridian Limited v. The Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
Recent Posts
- Advts enter police station Mhaa president RC Paul kanagaraj next plan
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3555 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.3853 and 3854 of 2026 1. A.Nagarajan 2. Agni Bala @ Balasubramanian … Petitioner
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2451 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.1894 and 1895 of 2024 1. S.Sathish Kumar 2. S.Selvi 3. M.Sathya
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL RC NO. 462 OF 2026 1. D.Sathishkumar S/o.Deiveegam, 2/134, Kattu Valavu, Kullampatti Village, Vazhappadi Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep. by The Inspector of PoliceCrime Branch CID, OCU, Salem.
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600
More
Recent Posts
- Advts enter police station Mhaa president RC Paul kanagaraj next plan
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.3555 of 2026 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.3853 and 3854 of 2026 1. A.Nagarajan 2. Agni Bala @ Balasubramanian … Petitioner
- THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.2451 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.1894 and 1895 of 2024 1. S.Sathish Kumar 2. S.Selvi 3. M.Sathya
- HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL RC NO. 462 OF 2026 1. D.Sathishkumar S/o.Deiveegam, 2/134, Kattu Valavu, Kullampatti Village, Vazhappadi Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. State Rep. by The Inspector of PoliceCrime Branch CID, OCU, Salem.
- THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29-05-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G. R. SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WMP No.21519 & 21523 of 2026 in WP No. 20111 of 2026 T.R.Ramesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600