Follow:
- Next story Setting aside the Thanjavur collector’s order which rejected an arbitration application on the ground that it was filed outside the prescribed period, the Madras high court held that there is no time limit specified for applying before the arbitrator under the National Highways Act, 1956. Justice S S Sundar observed that even otherwise if the Limitation Act, 1963, was applied in the case, the period prescribed under section 137, which is applicable in the present case, the appeal was filed well before time. “From the facts of the case in hand, this court is satisfied that the appeal had been filed within the prescribed time. Hence, this court has no hesitation to hold that the order passed by the collector dismissing the appeal on the ground of limitation is not only illegal on accounts of the judgements of the earlier division bench of this court, but also by accepting the case of the collector regarding application of Limitation Act,” observed the judge.
- Previous story The Madurai Bench of Madras High Courtheld that registered person making zero rated supply shall be eligible to claim IGSTrefunds, irrespective of the circular on clarifications on exports related refund issues (Circular No.37/2018-Customs, dated 09.10.2018). The ruling was made by a single bench consisting of Justice M.Govindaraj, in the case of M/s.Precot Meridian Limited v. The Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
Recent Posts
- சமரசம்/pmk Ramadoss பாட்டாளி மக்கள் கட்சியின் தலைவராக தன்னை அறிவிக்க கோரி தொடர்ந்து வழக்கை திரும்ப பெற்றார் city court civil court allowed to withdraw case
- Amstrong case sc judge k viswanath bench allowed Tn Govt to withdraw petition sc order cbi to file counter
- குதிரை பேரம் bail judge ilanthiriyan order state pp to file counter
- Not to harash senthil balaji pettion dismissed judge Ilanthiriyan/ state pp john satgya and Senior NR Elango
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
More
Recent Posts
- சமரசம்/pmk Ramadoss பாட்டாளி மக்கள் கட்சியின் தலைவராக தன்னை அறிவிக்க கோரி தொடர்ந்து வழக்கை திரும்ப பெற்றார் city court civil court allowed to withdraw case
- Amstrong case sc judge k viswanath bench allowed Tn Govt to withdraw petition sc order cbi to file counter
- குதிரை பேரம் bail judge ilanthiriyan order state pp to file counter
- Not to harash senthil balaji pettion dismissed judge Ilanthiriyan/ state pp john satgya and Senior NR Elango
- appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation. There shall be no order as to costs. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)