தமிழக அரசு தாக்கல் செய்த மனுவுக்கு மத்திய அரசு பதிலளிக்க உத்தரவு! TN Government | Education Fund | Central Government | Supreme Court#

You may also like...

• 

  .Applying the ratio laid down in the aforesaid decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court to the facts of the present case, this court is of the opinion that the second respondent bank being a secured creditor and created right over the property in question prior to the alleged attachment raised by the appellant and hence, they have preferential right over the claim of the appellant. In such view of the matter, the order of the learned Judge cannot be interfered with. 19.In fine, the writ appeal fails and is accordingly, dismissed. The appellant is directed to lift the attachment over the property in question, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. There is no order as to costs. (R.M.D., J.)       (J.S.N.P., J.). For Appellant :   Mr. V. Sundareswaran For Respondents :   Mr. R.N. Amarnath for R1 Mr.  F.B. Benjamin George for R2 JUDGMENT R.MAHADEVAN,J. The order of the learned Judge dated 12.02.2019 made in WP.No. 25185 of 2018 is questioned by the appellant / Revenue, in this writ appeal.

  July 7, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 7, 2022

• 

  மாமியார் தலையீடு செய்ய முடியாது என்று உயர் நீதிமன்றம்

  November 16, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published November 16, 2025

• 

  Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( civil ) no 12081 – 12082 of 2023 with contempt petitions 198 – 199 of 2024 dated 9th sep 2024 : M/ S sitaram enterprises vs Prithviraj vardichand jain : failure of tenant to handover possession to the landlord despite directions by Supreme court is guilty of contempt of court

  March 10, 2026

   by Sekar Reporter · Published March 10, 2026