ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt
ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம்
#SupremeCourt
Follow:
- Next story [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an order purely tracking the” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003#:~:text=Advocate%20M.Gnanasekar,purely%20tracking%20the [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: E-Court Case Status Or Adjournment Order Doesn’t Possess Traits Of Judgment; Writ Appeal Against It Not Maintainable: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- Previous story THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
Recent Posts
- [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an order purely tracking the” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003#:~:text=Advocate%20M.Gnanasekar,purely%20tracking%20the [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: E-Court Case Status Or Adjournment Order Doesn’t Possess Traits Of Judgment; Writ Appeal Against It Not Maintainable: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt
- THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
- Dismissed ponmudy case order. HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL RC No. 645 of 2026 AND CRL MP NO. 4867 OF 2026 K.Ponmudi S/o.late.M.Kandaswamy
- Election Commissioner of India, the six resigned MLAs concerned, the Union Ministry of Law & Justice, and the Hon’ble Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, in strict conformity with professional practice and as a responsible Senior Lawyer, thereby ensuring that all constitutional stakeholders were placed on notice contemporaneously. S.Kasiramalingam M.A.B.L., Advocate
More
Recent Posts
- [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: “Advocate M.Gnanasekar represented the Appellant while Government Pleader K. Kumaran represented the Respondent. Issue The issue before the Bench was whether a routine case-management entry, a e-court status update, or an order purely tracking the” https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003#:~:text=Advocate%20M.Gnanasekar,purely%20tracking%20the [02/07, 20:15] sekarreporter1: E-Court Case Status Or Adjournment Order Doesn’t Possess Traits Of Judgment; Writ Appeal Against It Not Maintainable: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/rnaresh-v-the-principal-secretary-to-government-2026mhc2328-e-court-case-status-writ-appeal-1617003 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- ஏ.ஐ. தொழில்நுட்பத்தை பயன்படுத்தி வழங்கப்பட்ட தீர்ப்பை ரத்துசெய்தது உச்ச நீதிமன்றம் #SupremeCourt
- THE HON’BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No. 6248 of 2026 Tamilazhagan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Prison Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009 2. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons Whannels Road, Egmore, Chennai-600 008 3. The Superintendent of prisons, Central prison-I, Puzhal, Chennai-600 066 4. The Tamil Nadu State Legal Services
- Dismissed ponmudy case order. HON’BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL RC No. 645 of 2026 AND CRL MP NO. 4867 OF 2026 K.Ponmudi S/o.late.M.Kandaswamy
- Election Commissioner of India, the six resigned MLAs concerned, the Union Ministry of Law & Justice, and the Hon’ble Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, in strict conformity with professional practice and as a responsible Senior Lawyer, thereby ensuring that all constitutional stakeholders were placed on notice contemporaneously. S.Kasiramalingam M.A.B.L., Advocate