Follow:
- Next story 2/12 W.P.No.34099/2019 & Batch Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned selection list, dated 20.11.2019, issued by the third respondent in respect of P.G.Assistants in Chemistry, quash the same, consequently, direct the respondents to select the petitioner as P.G. Assistant in Chemistry and appoint her in the said post. For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs.V.Annalakshmi, Government Advocate. For Respondent 3 : Mr.C.Munusamy, Spl.Govt.Pleader. COMMON ORDER The common issue that has been raised in all these Writ Petitions is that the candidates, who secured high marks and should have been fitted in General Turn, have been fitted in MBC/DNC Quota and, thereby, 34 persons, who would have got seats under MBC Quota, have been deprived of selection. 2. The third respondent issued a Notification on 12.06.2019, inviting applications through On-line from eligible candidates for direct recruitment to the posts of Post Graduate Assistants/Physical Education http://www.judis.nic.in
- Previous story [1/20, 15:54] sekarreporter1: SC rejects Nirbhaya case death row convict Pawan Kumar’s plea that he was a juvenile at the time of crime in December 2012. SC accepted police plea that his birth certificate showed that he was 19 years at the time of crime. [1/20, 15:54] sekarreporter1: 🦜
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025
More
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025
