Follow:
- Next story 2/12 W.P.No.34099/2019 & Batch Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned selection list, dated 20.11.2019, issued by the third respondent in respect of P.G.Assistants in Chemistry, quash the same, consequently, direct the respondents to select the petitioner as P.G. Assistant in Chemistry and appoint her in the said post. For Petitioner : Mr.M.R.Jothimanian For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mrs.V.Annalakshmi, Government Advocate. For Respondent 3 : Mr.C.Munusamy, Spl.Govt.Pleader. COMMON ORDER The common issue that has been raised in all these Writ Petitions is that the candidates, who secured high marks and should have been fitted in General Turn, have been fitted in MBC/DNC Quota and, thereby, 34 persons, who would have got seats under MBC Quota, have been deprived of selection. 2. The third respondent issued a Notification on 12.06.2019, inviting applications through On-line from eligible candidates for direct recruitment to the posts of Post Graduate Assistants/Physical Education http://www.judis.nic.in
- Previous story [1/20, 15:54] sekarreporter1: SC rejects Nirbhaya case death row convict Pawan Kumar’s plea that he was a juvenile at the time of crime in December 2012. SC accepted police plea that his birth certificate showed that he was 19 years at the time of crime. [1/20, 15:54] sekarreporter1: 🦜
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
More
Recent Posts
- Head notes /M Ravi Advocate / A) Tamil Nadu Civil Service (Disciplinary and Appeal) Rules, 1955 – Rule 17(b) – Tamil Nadu Government Servants Conduct Rules, 1973 – Delay in disciplinary proceedings – Petitioner, a Village Administrative Officer, was dismissed after a decade-long delay in proceedings for alleged irregularities in land issuance – The court found the delay prejudicial and discriminatory, as co-delinquents faced lesser penalties – The court emphasized the need for timely resolution in disciplinary matters. (Paras 3, 4, 25, 27
- Kanadasan son case mhc order
- Justice Mrs.Mala as Item No.24. Where Senior Advocate and Former State PP Mr.A.Natarajan appeared for the son of Kaviarasu Kannadhasan and sought the court intervention against the rejection order passed by Tamil Nadu EB department, who refused to provide EB connection
- Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad directed MTC to refund Rs 25,200 and clear all pending retirement dues with 6% annual interest.”
- கிறிஸ்துவ மத போதகர் ஜாமீன் கோரி
