Wla secretry met cj for opening of court

You may also like...

• 

  Justice S Vaidyanathan in his order observed, “Mere description of the pendency of the criminal case in the subject cannot be said to be arbitrary, biased or illegal. It is pertinent to mention here that if a person is charged with misconduct, then the said person has got to be transferred or shifted and in that case, it will be construed as a stigma, is an ancient theory. Under some pretext or the other, orders are obtained against the order of transfer, with which employees attempt to serve for decades in the same place.”

  April 14, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published April 14, 2021

• 

  Justices S. Vaidyanathan, V. Parthiban and M. Sundar deferred their judgment after hearing marathon arguments advanced by a battery of lawyers since February 17 this year. Over 40 advocates made their submissions before the Bench.

  September 30, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 30, 2020

• 

  Hon’ble Mr Justice Paresh Upadaiyya and Justice Sathikumar suukumarakurup after hearing the arguments of Suhirith Parthasarathy for Appellants and AAG Ravindran for State and P. Wilson Senior Advocate for inservice candidates dismissed the Appeal preferred by non service candidates .

  January 27, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published January 27, 2022