Why Marina Beach alone still remains shut, asks Madras HC – https://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/chennai/2020/nov/12/why-marina-beach-alone-still-remains-shut-asks-madras-hc-2222603.html

You may also like...

• 

  Resultantly, the Appeal Suit is partly allowed and the Judgment and Decree of the Trial Court is modified in the following terms: (i)         The plaintiff is entitled to 8/49 share in the Suit Properties and a Preliminary Decree is passed to that extent; (ii)       The defendants 2 to 6 and 8 are restrained from alienating / encumbering the Suit Properties so as to cause prejudice to the plaintiff’s 8/49 share in it, until complete partition is effected; (iii)     The Suit is dismissed qua seventh defendant. 27. Considering the relationship between the parties, there shall be no order as to costs.       23.07.2025 Index         : Yes Speaking Order                    : Yes Neutral Citation                    : Yes  TK To   The III Additional District Judge Salem.  R. SAKTHIVEL, J.   TK APPEAL SUIT NO.204 OF 2017 23.07.2025

  July 27, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 27, 2025

• 

  Court: Who are you? Counsel: I am a practising advocate at the Supreme Court. I am praying for CBI inquiry.

  October 3, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published October 3, 2025

• 

  THE HON-BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH and THE HON-BLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA W.P.No.9692 of 2020. -Considering the aforesaid submission made, we direct the official respondents to undertake the exercise of performing the kumbabishekam within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. No costs. (M.M.S., J.) (R.H., J.)

  September 10, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 10, 2020