Vinothpandian: AIR 2016 MP 79 : Balvir singh Gurjar @ Rinku vs Nitu : With regard to transfer of matrimonial petitions , section 21 A covers the cases filed under section 9 of the act , by operation of section 21 of the act , the subsequent petition must be transferred

[10/10, 10:31] Vinothpandian: AIR 2016 MP 79 : Balvir singh Gurjar @ Rinku vs Nitu : With regard to transfer of matrimonial petitions , section 21 A covers the cases filed under section 9 of the act , by operation of section 21 of the act , the subsequent petition must be transferred
[10/10, 10:31] Vinothpandian: 2016 (1) DMC 75 ( DB ) : Amarjit singh vs Garmeet kaur : In a matrimonial proceedings , the general allegations of refusing to prepare meals cannot be a ground to accept a plea of cruelty
[10/10, 10:38] Vinothpandian: 2020 (2) CTC 93 : Natesan poosar vs KM sundaramoorthy : partial rejection of plaint not permissible ( order 7 rule 11 CPC 1908)
[10/10, 14:10] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 868 : NN Global mercantile pvt ltd vs Indo unique flame ltd : Held civil aspect of fraud amenable to arbitration unless agreement itself rendered to be void , criminal fraud only amenable to jurisdiction of court of law as it may entail conviction
[10/10, 14:25] Vinothpandian: 2012 (6) supreme today 400 : sahara india real estate corporation ltd vs securities and exchange board of India : If assurances given to the court are not honoured , the court cannot come to the rescue of the party
[10/11, 15:04] Vinothpandian: AIR 1994 SC 975 : john D souza vs Edward Ani : Burden to prove allegation of professional misconduct allegedly committed by an advocate lies on complainant
[10/11, 15:04] Vinothpandian: AIR 2004 SC 1433 : firm ashok traders vs gurumukh das saluja : The court while passing an order under section 9 of the arbitration and coincilation act may put the party on terms and may recall the order if party commits breach of terms
[10/11, 15:10] Vinothpandian: AIR 2003 HP 69 : punjab national bank vs naraian dass : On failure of loanee to pay interest on agricultural loan obtained from bank , bank cannot charge compound interest with quarterly rates
[10/11, 15:14] Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) CPR 173 ( NC ) : PSEB vs Guriqbal singh Batra : The national commission deciding on consumer disputes had held disconnection of electricity in arbitrary manner is deficiency in service
[10/11, 15:14] Vinothpandian: 2002 (1) CPR 190 ( NC ) : Neelkammal industries vs MP electricity board : The consumer forum had held raising supplementary bill on the ground of defective electric meter without referring the matter to electricity inspector under section 26 (6) of the electricity act is deficiency in service
[10/11, 15:14] Vinothpandian: 1980 (3) SCC 29 : NC singhal vs union of india : mere expression of opinion cannot create an estoppel
[10/11, 15:14] Vinothpandian: 2000 (4) SCC 262 : Government of AP vs satyanarayana rao : A case cannot be referred to a larger bench on mere asking of a party
[10/11, 15:14] Vinothpandian: 2002 (3) CPR 173 ( NC ) : PSEB vs Guriqbal singh Batra : The national commission deciding on consumer disputes had held disconnection of electricity in arbitrary manner is deficiency in service
[10/11, 15:14] Vinothpandian: 1980 (3) SCC 29 : NC singhal vs union of india : mere expression of opinion cannot create an estoppel
[10/11, 15:14] Vinothpandian: 2002 (1) CPR 190 ( NC ) : Neelkammal industries vs MP electricity board : The consumer forum had held raising supplementary bill on the ground of defective electric meter without referring the matter to electricity inspector under section 26 (6) of the electricity act is deficiency in service
[10/11, 15:14] Vinothpandian: 2000 (4) SCC 262 : Government of AP vs satyanarayana rao : A case cannot be referred to a larger bench on mere asking of a party
[10/12, 10:42] Vinothpandian: 2011(6) SCC 343 : state of Rajasthan vs Islam : A miscarriage of justice which may arise from acquittal of the guilty is no less than from a conviction of an innocent
[10/12, 10:47] Vinothpandian: 2013 (1) crimes 113 : Arun bhandari vs state of UP : Paramount duties of superior court is to see that person who is absolutely innocent is not subjected to prosecution and humiliation on the basis of a false and wholly untenable complaint ( sec 482 CRPC 1973 )
[10/12, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 34 : Axis bank vs punjab national bank : debt as used in the RDDBFI act sec 2 includes liability arising out of fraudulent transaction causing wrongful loss to a bank or financial institution
[10/12, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 532 : bhopal thapa vs bina boro : disputed facts on fraud cannot be decided by debt recovery tribunal
[10/12, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 1975 (1) SCC 120 : smt satya vs Teja singh : If a judgement being obtained by fraud or accusation or was delivered by a court which has no jurisdiction , such judgement is not binding
[10/12, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2007 (1) SCC ( cri ) 54 : subhash maruthi Avasare vs state of maharastra : mere filing of a document would not prove the contents of documents
[10/12, 10:53] Vinothpandian: AIR 1959 SC 1041 : ujagar singh vs mst jeo : when a custom is repeatedly recognised by court it passes into the law of the land and the proof of it becomes unnecessary
[10/12, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2021 (1) CTC 275 : Board of trustees of the port of chennai vs X press container line : Held limitation under article 137 applicable to section 11 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996
[10/12, 10:53] Vinothpandian: 2015 (1) DRTC 66 : shanti jaiswal & another vs state bank of india : After issuance of certificate or an order for recovery of dues of creditor bank , DRT or recovery officer cannot go behind decree / certificate , recovery officer is bound to execute it
[10/13, 14:12] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : civil appeal no 1661 of 2020 dated 6-09-2022 state tax officer vs Rainbow papers ltd : Held in IBC proceedings , resolution plan to be rejected if it ignores statutory demands payable to any state government
[10/13, 14:13] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : civil appeal no 2277 of 2021 dated 30-09-2022 : punjab national bank vs Mr vijay sitaram dandnaik : Held IBC is projected as a law which enables financial / operational creditor to initiate CIRP not for helping himself out with recovery of debt due to him , but for helping corporate debtor to survive and continue in business
[10/13, 14:28] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP no 16013 of 2022 dated 26-09-2022 Balkrishna Rama tarle dead through LRS vs Phoenix ARC pvt ltd : In a SARFASI proceedings under section 14 CMM / DM is not required to adjudicate dispute between borrower and secured creditor and or between any third party and secured creditor with respect to secured assets
[10/13, 16:21] Vinothpandian: AIR 1982 ker 1238 : narayan vs mathan mathai : decision of criminal proceeding is not admissible in a civil suit
[10/13, 16:21] Vinothpandian: AIR 1997 SC 448 : chintaman vs state of maharastra : mere oral evidence of sole transactions without filing certified copy of sale deed cannot make them admissible
[10/13, 16:21] Vinothpandian: 1997 (1) RCR 374 SC : DK Basu vs state of west bengal : courts have the obligation to satisfy the social aspirations of the citizens because courts and law are for the people and expected to respond to their aspirations
[10/14, 10:23] Vinothpandian: 1972 (1) SCC 849 : Prabhawati vs Dr pritam kaur : decision of court cannot be frustrated by trickeries
[10/14, 10:23] Vinothpandian: 2009 (5) SCC 713 : vimal chand ghevarchand jain vs Ramakant eknath jadoo : Held equitable relief can be prayed for by a party which approaches court with clean hands
[10/14, 10:23] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 526 : sivanadiyan vs sub registrar pudukottai : Regarding production of original title deeds at a time of registration , registering authority not empowered to insist on production.of original document in absence of specific provision
[10/14, 10:23] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 332 : state of rajasthan vs Heem singh SC ; In a disciplinary proceedings , disciplinary authority not governed by evidence act but by principles of natural justice , court in judicial review not to reappreciate evidence
[10/14, 10:23] Vinothpandian: 1999 (2) SCC 458 : Ishar singh vs district & sessions judge : persons taking cover of religious practice to defeat process of law is not entitled to any equitable considerations
[10/14, 10:23] Vinothpandian: 1971 (2) SCC 58 : Harkishan singh vs state of punjab : where equities are equal , the one first in point of time shall prevail
[10/14, 10:23] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 7 ( DB) : gopuram enterprises ltd vs integrated finance company ltd : Held post – award petition for interim measures maintainable only until award becomes enforceable ( section 9 Arbitration and coincilation act )
[10/14, 10:23] Vinothpandian: 2021 (2) CTC 111 SC : subhechha welfare society vs Earth infrastructure pvt ltd : Held recognized consumer association can file complaint on behalf of several consumers in one complaint ( sec 12 (1)(b) consumer protection act 1986 )