Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) law herald 2611 : mukul Chauhan vs neha agarwal : interim custody of child below age of 5 years shall be with mother , the natural guardian of a hindu minor in case of a boy or an unmarried girl would be the father and after him the mother but for the purpose of custody of a minor who has not completed the age of 5 years shall ordinarily be with the mother

[3/17, 22:11] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) law herald 2611 : mukul Chauhan vs neha agarwal : interim custody of child below age of 5 years shall be with mother , the natural guardian of a hindu minor in case of a boy or an unmarried girl would be the father and after him the mother but for the purpose of custody of a minor who has not completed the age of 5 years shall ordinarily be with the mother
[3/18, 09:33] Vinothpandian: 2020 (1) SCC ( cri ) 94 : central bureau of investigation vs Arvind Khanna: High court recording findings on several disputed facts , high court went into minute details on the allegations that after cognizance was taken , high exceeded its power under section 482 CRPC 1973
[3/18, 09:33] Vinothpandian: 2019 (8) SCC 387 : Amir Hamza Shaikh vs state of maharashtra: Pertaining to grant of permission for prosecution. By magistrate , magistrate not bound to grant permission at the mere asking , but victim has a right to assist the court in a trial before magistrate
[3/19, 18:09] Vinothpandian: 2018 (1) SCC 560 : meters and instruments pvt ltd vs kanchan Mehta: In a proceedings under section 138 NI act , it is the discretion of magistrate without causing prejudice to prosecution proceedings to dispense with personal appearance of accused under sec 205 of CRPC 1973
[3/19, 18:09] Vinothpandian: 2019 (3) SCC ( cri ) 181 : Abdul wahab k vs state of kerala : Public prosecutor under section 321 CRPC 1973 can withdraw from prosecution at any time before the judgement is pronounced , but he has to apply his / her own mind and consider the effect of withdrawal on the society in the event such permission is granted
[3/19, 21:24] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Aman Lohia vs kiran Lohia transferred case ( civil ) no 25 of 2021 dated 17- 03- 2021 : family court required to follow procedure under CPC and provide parties with sufficient time and opportunity to present their claim in form of pleadings and evidence before determination of dispute
[3/19, 21:24] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Aparna bhatt & others vs state of madhya pradesh criminal appeal no 329 of 2021 dated 18- 03- 2021 : bail conditions should not mandate require or permit contact between accused and victim , such conditions should seek to protect complainant from any further harassment by accused
[3/20, 21:53] Vinothpandian: Supreme court :commercial.taxes officer circle – B, Bharatpur vs M/ S Bhagat singh SLP no 15870 of 2020 dated 21- 01- 2021 : interpretation of a statute must be in just reasonable and sensible manner , if grammatical construction leads to some absurdity with legislative intent it may be departed from.to avoid anomaly , absurdity or inconsistency
[3/20, 21:53] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : Rajendra khare vs swaati nirkhi and others review application ( Crl ) no 671 of 2018 dated 28- 01- 2021 : Rejection of application for recalling of judgement filed by review petitioner , review petitioner cannot be precluded from filing review petition
[3/20, 22:01] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : government of maharashtra ( water resources department ) represented by executive engineer vs M/ S Borse engineers & contractors pvt Ltd: delay beyond 120 days for arbitration appeal under section 37 of the arbitration and conciliation can be condoned , judgement of division bench of supreme court in 2020 (2) SCC 109 overruled , ( civil appeal 999 of 2021 dated 19- 03 – 2021 )

You may also like...