Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 1846 : Balram vs state ( NCT of delhi ) : The statement of a hostile witness can also be examined to the extent that it supports the case of the prosecution

[10/09, 09:40] Vinothpandian: 2018 CRI LJ 1846 : Balram vs state ( NCT of delhi ) : The statement of a hostile witness can also be examined to the extent that it supports the case of the prosecution
[10/09, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 309 : Lakshya concosts pvt ltd vs bank of baroda : chief metropolitan magistrate or district magistrate only empowered to assist secured creditor in taking over possession of secured asset ( sec 14 SARFASI act )
[10/09, 09:41] Vinothpandian: 2010 (11) SCC 203 : central bank of india vs Asian global ltd : In a cheque dishonour case , merely being a director would not make a person liable for an offence that may have been committed by company
[10/09, 09:41] Vinothpandian: AIR 2018 SC 4647 : Achpal @ Ramswaroop vs state of Rajasthan : Regarding extension of period for completing investigation , no court could either directly or indirectly extend such period , mere recording of submission of public prosecutor could not be taken to be an order granting extension