Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 729 ; kotak mahindra bank ltd vs kothari industrial corporation : If tribunals and subordinate courts are allowed to function without following binding

[22/08, 11:30] Vinothpandian: 2015 (2) DRTC 729 ; kotak mahindra bank ltd vs kothari industrial corporation : If tribunals and subordinate courts are allowed to function without following binding observations of superior courts there will be judicial chaos
[22/08, 11:31] Vinothpandian: 2019 (2) MWN ( cri ) 1 ( DB ) : state rep by inspector of police vs VP pandi : facts indisputably widely known to public can be taken judicial notice of by court
[22/08, 11:31] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 784 : Dipankar chakraborty vs Allahabad bank : sec 19 RDDBFI act : Pendency of proceeding before DRT under RDDBFI.act will not save period of limitation for a proceeding under SARFASI act , if proceeding under SARFASI act is by itself barred by laws of limitation
[22/08, 11:31] Vinothpandian: 2016 (2) DRTC 128 : state bank of india vs Veetee fine foods ltd : When bank or parties seek stamp of approval of compromise or settlement , then tribunal would be competent to examine said settlement or compromise in terms of sec 19 ( 20- A ) of RDDBFI act

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

You may also like...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version