You may also like...
Follow:
- Next story While allowing the Writ Petition, the Madras High Court has held that the GST Department could be levied interest only on the cash component of the tax remitted belatedly but not on ITC available. The ruling was made by the bench comprising of member Dr Justice Anita Sumanth in the case of M/s.Refex Industries Limited Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise.
- Previous story Karuvela Maram case full bench Polimer TV news video
Recent Posts
- Acter case
- BEFORE THE HON’BLE CITY CIVIL COURT AT CHENNAI O.S. No. of 2026 Dr.S.Ramadass,
- Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai is hereby set aside and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands allowed. No costs. [N.A.V, J.] & [K.K.R.K, J.] 15.04.2026
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP, Represented by its designated partner Mr. Y. Meera Reddy
- Temple Standing For Over 50 Years In Layout Park Cannot Be Treated As Encroachment; Is Part And Parcel Of Park: Madras High Court The Court dismissed the writ petition with a cost of Rs.1lakh, observing that the petition appeared to be filed with malafide intent to incite communal unrest. CASEDETAILS Case Title Jesudass Cornelius v. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District & Ors. Case No. WP No.1200 of 2022 Bench Justice Krishnan Ramasamy Date of Order 04 March 2026 Result Petition Dismissed with Costs Petition Dismissed with Rs.1 lakh cost
More
Recent Posts
- Acter case
- BEFORE THE HON’BLE CITY CIVIL COURT AT CHENNAI O.S. No. of 2026 Dr.S.Ramadass,
- Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai is hereby set aside and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands allowed. No costs. [N.A.V, J.] & [K.K.R.K, J.] 15.04.2026
- Order setaside THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 13561 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 12759 OF 2022,WMP NO. 12760 OF 2022, WMP NO. 12761 OF 2022 Delphina Consultants LLP, Represented by its designated partner Mr. Y. Meera Reddy
- Temple Standing For Over 50 Years In Layout Park Cannot Be Treated As Encroachment; Is Part And Parcel Of Park: Madras High Court The Court dismissed the writ petition with a cost of Rs.1lakh, observing that the petition appeared to be filed with malafide intent to incite communal unrest. CASEDETAILS Case Title Jesudass Cornelius v. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District & Ors. Case No. WP No.1200 of 2022 Bench Justice Krishnan Ramasamy Date of Order 04 March 2026 Result Petition Dismissed with Costs Petition Dismissed with Rs.1 lakh cost