Follow:
- Next story Justice PT Asha noted that there were limits to how far a Court can interfere under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when it comes to modifying an arbitral award. In this regard, she cited a 2019 Madras High Court ruling in the case of SG Novasoft Technologies Limited v. Gayathri Balusamy, wherein it was held, “A reasonable interpretation to Section 34 would only lead to an irresistible conclusion that the Court can modify or vary the Award of the Arbitrator if it is contrary to the material evidence adduced by the parties.”
- Previous story Case in mhc affidavit –finalise the Annual Fees from the Academic year 2017-18 onwards for the PG Medical Degree Courses in the Deemed to be University
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN P.(MD).No.4619 of 2025and W.M.P.(MD).No.3310 of 2025 A.R.Dairy Food Private Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory, R.Rajadharshini .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,
- In her reply speech, Justice Trivedi expressed gratitude and said that she is satisfied that she always acted as per her inner conscience.
- Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Karnataka High Court Judge As Next Chief Justice Of Manipur High Court
- Justices P Velmurugan and KK Ramakrishnan passed the directions on a PIL petition moved by P Ramesh (52) of Nerur in Manmangalam taluk of Karur. Ramesh in his plea stated that the Aravayee
- Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan while hearing the case where the Respondent- MP Road Development Corporation (“MPRDC”) had initially participated in arbitration
More
Recent Posts
- MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN P.(MD).No.4619 of 2025and W.M.P.(MD).No.3310 of 2025 A.R.Dairy Food Private Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory, R.Rajadharshini .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Food Safety and Standards Authority of India,
- In her reply speech, Justice Trivedi expressed gratitude and said that she is satisfied that she always acted as per her inner conscience.
- Supreme Court Collegium Recommends Karnataka High Court Judge As Next Chief Justice Of Manipur High Court
- Justices P Velmurugan and KK Ramakrishnan passed the directions on a PIL petition moved by P Ramesh (52) of Nerur in Manmangalam taluk of Karur. Ramesh in his plea stated that the Aravayee
- Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan while hearing the case where the Respondent- MP Road Development Corporation (“MPRDC”) had initially participated in arbitration