Follow:
- Next story Police castigated for booking ‘whistleblowers’ Chennai, July 26 (PTI): The Madras High Court has unleashed a scathing attack on the investigating agency, in this case the police in Coimbatore city, for registering various cases and FIRs against a person, said to be a journalist and arresting him, even under the Goondas Act.
- Previous story Full orderTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.30074 of 2019—–Finding that the Authority concerned has deeply gone into all the factual and legal aspects and conferred permanent status on the Workmen, which, in the considered opinion of this Court, is perfectly valid and justified and does not warrant any interference by this Court. Hence, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, this Writ Petition filed by the Management is dismissed, on the ground of bereft of essence and substance and devoid of merits. It is true that no time limit is prescribed under the 1981 Act for seeking permanency, but at the same time, the employees must have approached the Authority concerned at least within a reasonable time frame. In the present case on hand, the employees have slept over for quite a long time and knocked at the doors of the Authority only in the year 2009. Once the order of the Authority is confirmed, all the benefits accrued to the employees should be extended to the employees from the date of permanency. However, taking into account the present pandemic situation and considering the fact that there is a delay in approaching the Authority, this Court, invoking the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, deprives backwages till today. However, it is made clear that on and from the date of completion of 480 days in a period of 24 calendar months, the employees are entitled to continuity of service, with all other notional and consequential benefits, that are available to their counter parts and the same shall be extended to them within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 24.06.2021 Index: Yes/No Speaking order / Non speaking order ar Note: Issue order copy and upload in the Web on 26.07.2021
Recent Posts
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*
- Section 164 CrPC Statement Can Be Used For POCSO Conviction Where Victim Turns Hostile But Admits Signature & Does Not Allege Coercion: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/murugan-v-state-rep-by-inspector-of-police-2026mhc1907-pocso-section-164-1615412 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- sekarreporter1: “Justice L. Victoria Gowri passed the order while allowing a petition filed by Thomas @ Dhamas and Lingabalan seeking quashing of proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. The case was registered under Sections 294(b), 341, 353 and 506(ii) of the Indian” https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/criminal-law-cannot-silence-citizens-for-questioning-police-action-madras-high-court-quashes-fir-1598988#:~:text=Justice%20L.%20Victoria%20Gowri%20passed%20the%20order%20while%20allowing%20a%20petition%20filed%20by%20Thomas%20%40%20Dhamas%20and%20Lingabalan%20seeking%20quashing%20of%20proceedings%20pending%20before%20the%20Judicial%20Magistrate%2C%20Paramakudi.%20The%20case%20was%20registered%20under%20Sections%20294(b)%2C%20341%2C%20353%20and%20506(ii)%20of%20the%20Indian
- The Madras High Court, on Friday (June 5), asked State not to take any action till June 23, against ex-Minister KN Nehru, others in an alleged bribery case in connection with appointments to Municipal
More
Recent Posts
- Contempt action: Lawyers seek Madurai magistrate’s removal The demonstration witnessed a brief confrontation between the advocates and the police at the High Court main entrance when a section of them forcibly entered the campus.
- Judge kumaresh babu/Madras HC upholds Rs.10.01 lakh damages against Sun TV for airing 1996 Veerappan interview with defamatory remarks against actress Sukanya: “Broadcaster had power to edit, failed to verify, regret in third-party magazine ≠ apology. Malice proved.”*
- Section 164 CrPC Statement Can Be Used For POCSO Conviction Where Victim Turns Hostile But Admits Signature & Does Not Allege Coercion: Madras High Court https://www.verdictum.in/madras-high-court/murugan-v-state-rep-by-inspector-of-police-2026mhc1907-pocso-section-164-1615412 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media
- sekarreporter1: “Justice L. Victoria Gowri passed the order while allowing a petition filed by Thomas @ Dhamas and Lingabalan seeking quashing of proceedings pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi. The case was registered under Sections 294(b), 341, 353 and 506(ii) of the Indian” https://lawbeat.in/news-updates/criminal-law-cannot-silence-citizens-for-questioning-police-action-madras-high-court-quashes-fir-1598988#:~:text=Justice%20L.%20Victoria%20Gowri%20passed%20the%20order%20while%20allowing%20a%20petition%20filed%20by%20Thomas%20%40%20Dhamas%20and%20Lingabalan%20seeking%20quashing%20of%20proceedings%20pending%20before%20the%20Judicial%20Magistrate%2C%20Paramakudi.%20The%20case%20was%20registered%20under%20Sections%20294(b)%2C%20341%2C%20353%20and%20506(ii)%20of%20the%20Indian
- The Madras High Court, on Friday (June 5), asked State not to take any action till June 23, against ex-Minister KN Nehru, others in an alleged bribery case in connection with appointments to Municipal