You may also like...
-
Judges cricket live
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 20, 2021
-
[27/01, 12:25] Vinothpandian: 2012 ( 1) DRTC 829 : moin leather wear exports & others vs oriental bank of commerce : DRT under guise of setting aside ex parte order cannot recover amount without taking up the matter on merits[27/01, 12:25] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 629 : Panther fin cap & management services ltd vs bank of india : DRT is not a civil court and provisions of CPC cannot be straight way made applicable to proceedings in respect of recovery of amount by recovery officer exercising powers under RDDBFI act 1993[27/01, 12:25] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) BC 1 : B Rajarajeswari vs presiding officer DRT 2 sec 27 ( 4) of RDDBFI act 1993 : circumstances under which a recovery certificate may be amended or withdrawn mentioned in sec 27(4) of RDDBFI act[27/01, 12:25] Vinothpandian: 2017 ( 2) DRTC 630 : Panther fincap & management services ltd vs bank of india : section 25 ( b) RDDBFI act 1993 : Recovery officer recorded findings that though borrower had sufficient means to pay had deliberately avoided to pay debt of bank , wilful disobedience on part of borrowers calls for extreme action like putting them in civil prison by taking recourse to remedies provided under section 25( b) of RDDBFI act 1993[27/01, 12:25] Vinothpandian: 2020 (5) CTC 448 : chenrayan vs kaveri : plea of adverse possession is stand alone concept and cannot be fitted with plea of ownership
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 27, 2024
-
Advocate-general Vijay Narayan also submitted that the State had passed a Government Order doing away with mandatory e-pass requirement for intrastate travellers. The first bench of Chief Justice AP Sahi and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy was hearing a plea moved by KR Ezhil Nadhi challenging the restriction to travel to hill stations.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 29, 2020