TAMIL NADU PROHIBITION OF RAGGING ACT 1997 Compiled by Mrs. Adhilakshmi Logamurthy Advocate, High Court Madras Objective: To prohibit Ragging in Educational Institutions in Tamil Nadu.
TAMIL NADU PROHIBITION OF RAGGING ACT 1997
Compiled by
Mrs. Adhilakshmi Logamurthy
Advocate, High Court Madras
Mobile : 9841014926 Email : advocateadhilogu@gmail.com
Objective: To prohibit Ragging in Educational Institutions in Tamil Nadu.
Section 1 : Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Ragging Act 1997
Extent : State of Tamil Nadu
Commencement of Ordinance : 19.12.1996
Section 2 : Definitions
Unless the context otherwise requires
Ragging means
- Display of noisy, disorderly conduct
- Doing any act which caused or likely to cause
- Physical or psychological harm
- Apprehension or
- Fear or
- Shame or
- Embarrassment
- To a student of any Educational Institution.
Includes
- Teasing, abusing, playing practical joke or Causing hurt to such student.
- Asking the student to do any act, which such student is not willing
Section 3 : Prohibition of Ragging
– Ragging within or without any educational institution is prohibited
Section 4 : Penalty for Ragging
– Whoever, directly or indirectly
- Commits ragging
- Participates in it
- Abets Ragging
- Propagates Ragging within or without the educational institution.
Penalty – Imprisonment may extend to 2 years plus fine upto
Rs.10,000/-
Note – Same Punishment for Management also.
Section 5 : Dismissal of Student
- Any student convicted of an offence u/s 4,
- Shall also be dismissed from the educational institution
- And such student shall not be admitted in any other educational institution
Section 6 : Suspension of Student
Sub-section (1)
- Any student complains of Ragging
- To the Head of the educational institution or to any other person managing the institution
- If so such person receiving the complaint
- Shall inquire into the same immediately
- And if found true
- Shall suspend the student who has committed the offence from the Educational Institution.
Sub-section (2)
Decision under sub-sec (1) shall be final
Section 7 : Deemed Abetment.
- if the Institution
- fails or neglects
- to take action as under section 6 (1) of this Act
- such head or managing person
- shall be deemed to have abetted the offence of Ragging – and shall be punished as provided under Section 4.
Section 8 : Power to make Rules
Vests with the Government of Tamil Nadu
Section 9 : Repeal and savings
Sub-section 1 : Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Ragging Ordinance 1996 is repealed.
Sub-section 2 : Whatever done U/Ordinance is equal to be done under this Act.
CITATION : Neelam Shetty Vs The National Council for Hotel management, New Delhi
2013 (1) CWC 775
———
TAMIL NADU PROHIBITION OF RAGGING RULES 1999 G.O. 366 Higher Education G-1 dated 26.07.1999
Pursuant to Section 8 of the Act – 7 Rules
Rule 1 : Short Title : Tamil Nadu Prohibition Of Ragging Rules 1999 Commencement 26.07.1999
Rule 2 | : Definition
Act |
Government
Management Head |
|
|
Person Managing |
Rule 3
|
: Mode of Complaint o By the student affected o In writing – to the management o Within (3 days) from the date of occurrence. |
Rule 4
|
: Procedure for Receipt of complaint o Management shall inquire the complaint immediately with 72 hours
o Either by himself or through a senior teaching staff o If found guilty (the student or any other person) o Make a written complaint within 24 hours to the Jurisdictional Police station o The officer in charge of the police station shall register the complaint and proceed as per law. |
Rule 5 | : Duty to Report to |
- University
- Concerned Government Department
- Government
- By the Management
- On completion of inquiry under Rule 4 within 24 hours.
Rule 6 | : Duty of the Police Officer |
|
Under section 4 of the Act it is to be reported to a) The institution
b) The university c) The Government Department d) The Government |
Rule 7 | : Revocation and Treatment of period of suspension |
- Suspend under section 6 of the Act
- But case ended in acquittal
- Suspended period shall be treated as affected period