You may also like...
-
-
MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD).No.6354 of 2010 and. 14.This Court is of the considered opinion that the punishment imposed on the writ petitioner cannot be construed as disproportionate with reference to the charges established against the writ petitioner and the speaking orders passed by the respondents.
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 16, 2020
-
The same are accordingly allowed and the impugned judgment/s of the High Court are set aside. Resultantly, W.P.No.16759 of 2015 filed by respondent/M. Jayabal and W.P. No 16758 of 2015 filed by respondent/S. Veeramani before the High Court are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. ……………….……………..J. (RAJESH BINDAL) ……………….……………..J. (MANMOHAN) New Delhi December 12, 2025.
by Sekar Reporter · Published December 13, 2025
