Supreme Court on Monday (Sep. 22) flagged a significant inconsistency between the SARFAESI Act, 2

Login Subscribe Premium Login Gift Premium Subscription Premium LiveLaw Hindi Top Stories Supreme Court High Court News Updates Articles Law Schools Law Firms Videos Know The Law Digests Law Firms Law Schools Corner More Academy Bazar NEW Contact Us Advertise With Us Careers Who We Are Home/Supreme court/SARFAESI Act | Supreme Court Flags… SARFAESI Act | Supreme Court Flags Inconsistency Between S.13(8) Act & Rules On Borrower’s Redemption Right, Urges Govt To Amend Yash Mittal 22 Sept 2025 9:18 PM (8 mins read ) Share this The Supreme Court on Monday (Sep. 22) flagged a significant inconsistency between the SARFAESI Act, 2002 (“Act”) and the Rules concerning the borrower’s right of redemption after the 2016 amendment. A bench of J
Mahadevan heard the case arising out of the Madras High Court’s decision which had quashed a sale certificate issued in favour of auction… This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers Subscribe Premium INR 1099+GST Your support helps us to bring you more content at an affordable subscription scheme !!! All payment options available Tags Supreme CourtJustice JB Pardiwala and Justice R MahadevanSARFAESI Act 2002Section 13(8) SARFAESI ActM. RAJENDRAN & ORS. VERSUS M/S KPK OILS AND PROTIENS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ORS. Next Story Supreme Court Daily Round-Up : September 23, 2025 LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 23 Sept 2025 9:16 PM (2 mins read ) Share this Links of today’s reports. Listen to this Article Supreme Court Dismisses CCI’s Appeal Against Delhi High Court Verdict Quashing Probe Against Ericsson & Monsanto Is Scheduled Caste Reservation In Special Component Plan Colleges Bound By 50% Ceiling Limit? Supreme Court To Consider Supreme Court Directs MP High Court To Conclude Civil Judge Recruitment Process As Per 2023 Advertisement Soon No Export Duty On Transfer From Domestic Tariff Area To SEZ : Supreme Court Dismisses Union’s Appeal Against Adani Power Uphaar Cinema Tragedy | Supreme Court Proposes Inspection Of Trauma Centres Built Using Fine Amount Paid By Ansal Brothers SARFAESI | Supreme Court Explains “Publication Of Notice” Which Extinguishes Borrower’s Redemption Right Under Section 13(8) Supreme Court Issues Notice On Plea Seeking CBI/SIT Investigation Into Murder Of Congress Leader’s Driver In Madhya Pradesh Supreme Court Imposes Rs.1 Lakh Cost On Advocate For Scandalous Allegations Against Woman; Suspends Bar License For 3 Years Supreme Court Summarises Principles On Retrospective Application Of Laws ‘You Can’t Plead Helplessness’ : Supreme Court Pulls Up CBI For Not Arresting Two Cops In MP Custodial Death Case Passing Judgment Against ‘Bulldozer’ Actions Gave Immense Satisfaction : CJI BR Gavai Supreme Court Dismisses Airports Authority’s Appeal Against Service Tax Levy For Cargo Handling Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Seeking Age-Relaxation For Displaced Kashmiri Pandits In Govt Recruitments Second Special Leave Petition Not Maintainable If First SLP Against Same Order Was Withdrawn Unconditionally : Supreme Court ‘Child Abuse Survivors Must Not Be Re-Traumatized’ : Supreme Court Rejects POCSO Convict’s Plea To Recall Victim For Cross Examination Judicial Officer Who Had 7 Year Practice As Advocate Eligible For District Judge Direct Appointment : Petitioners Argue In Supreme Court [Day 1] ‘Disturbing’ : Supreme Court Slams Registry For 3 Years’ Delay In Listing Case, Orders Enquiry Builder-Bank Nexus: After Preliminary Enquiry Finds Cognizable Offence Over Outside NCR Projects, Supreme Court Asks CBI To Register FIR Passing Judgment Against ‘Bulldozer’ Actions Gave Immense Satisfaction : CJI BR Gavai Supreme Court Raises Concerns Over Judicial Officers’ Career Stagnation Due To Delay In Promotions Similar Posts Supreme Court Daily Round-Up : September 23, 2025 Links of today’s reports. ‘Disturbing’ : Supreme Court Slams Registry For 3 Years’ Delay In Listing Case, Orders Enquiry The Supreme Court strongly criticized its Registry for delaying the listing of a case by over three years despite a clear judicial order to list it ‘immediately after service.’ The Court directed the Registrar (Judicial) to conduct an inquiry into the lapse and submit a report within two weeks identifying the officer responsible.”A bench of… ‘Child Abuse Survivors Must Not Be Re-Traumatized’ : Supreme Court Rejects POCSO Convict’s Plea To Recall Victim For Cross Examination The Court said that allowing such a plea would be a “judicial insult” to the sanctity of womanhood. Second Special Leave Petition Not Maintainable If First SLP Against Same Order Was Withdrawn Unconditionally : Supreme Court The Supreme Court on Tuesday (Sep.23) held that once a Special Leave Petition (SLP) is withdrawn unconditionally, a second SLP challenging the same order is not maintainable. The Court further clarified that if a review against the impugned order is dismissed, neither the dismissal of the review nor the original order