Supreme Court Allows Two Judicial Officers In Uttarakhand To Join Delhi Judicial Service, Says HC’s Denial Of Permission Violates Rights |@mittal_mtn #SupremeCourt

by Sekar Reporter · January 20, 2026

Supreme Court Allows Two Judicial Officers In Uttarakhand To Join Delhi Judicial Service, Says HC’s Denial Of Permission Violates Rights |@mittal_mtn

#SupremeCourt

Share this post:

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email

You may also like...

• 

  DIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :15.09.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.17570 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.18682 of 2021 N.C.Sridhar …Petitioner. —The “Special Cell” constituted in the Head Quarters shall have separate Telephone / Mobile Numbers and such numbers must be displayed in all the temples and in the offices of the HR & CE Department, facilitating the general public / devotees to register their complaints. (10) The Director General of Police is directed to provide all the necessary protections to the Government officials and the officials engaged by the HR & CE Department to perform the works, as and when required. 67. With all the above

  September 15, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published September 15, 2021

• 

  MR JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP Crl. No. 267 of 2025 and WPMP Crl.No.114 of 2025 Visalakshi W/o.P.Nagedran(Life convict No.1236

  July 31, 2025

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 31, 2025

• 

  BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.06.2021 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).No.10177 of 2021 S.R.M.Packiri Rajan 13. It is made clear that this procedure must be scrupulously followed in all cases, where the transaction has been declared to be a fraudulent one by the competent Authority and such order has become final. The Inspector General of Registration shall refer to this order and issue a circular to all the Sub Registrar Offices across Tamil Nadu and direct them to strictly follow the directions issued in the earlier circular dated 31.07.2018. 14. In view of the above, this Court is inclined to interfere with the impugned communication of the third respondent and accordingly, the same is quashed. There shall be a direction to the third respondent to take steps to record the proceedings of the second respondent, dated 30.04.2019 in the relevant books and the same should be reflected in the Encumbrance Certificate. This will effectively reverse the earlier entry that was made when the sale deed was executed in favour of the fifth respondent and which has been subsequently held to be a fraudulent transaction. This process shall be completed by the third respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

  June 22, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published June 22, 2021