The Madras High Court heard the CBFC’s appeal in the Jana Nayagan certification case. 2. The CBFC argued that it was not given enough time to file its reply before the Single Judge.

by Sekar Reporter · January 20, 2026

ENGLISH:

1. The Madras High Court heard the CBFC’s appeal in the Jana Nayagan certification case.

2. The CBFC argued that it was not given enough time to file its reply before the Single Judge.

3. CBFC said the 6 January communication sending the film for review was never challenged in Court.

4. The Court discussed how the Examining Committee, Advisory Panel and CBFC Board function.

5. The ASG (CBFC) explained that the Examining Committee’s recommendations are not final or binding.

6. The Court focused on whether the CBFC was given fair opportunity before the Single Judge passed orders.

7. After finishing arguments, the ASG concluded his submissions.

8. The Court said it will hear the producers’ arguments after lunch.