You may also like...
-
S.A.Nos.208 and 421 of 2014 [01.03.2022] Heading: (a) Is undue influence different from coercion – Held Yes. (b) Can presumption under Section 111 of the Indian Evidence Act be invoked when the execution of document is admitted – Held No. (c) Is presumption under Section 111 of the Indian Evidence Act can be invoked for presumption of undue influence on close relationship – Held No. Only after the plaintiff establishes the prima facie case, merely because the parties are in close relationship, they could not automatically lead to presumption of undue influence. Full order of. THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN S.A.Nos.208 and 421 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
by Sekar Reporter · Published April 20, 2022
-
4.1 The plaintiff was named after one of martyrs of the anti-Hindi agitation, viz., M.Rasendran. On account of his deep love for the Tamil language, the plaintiff authored the script CHEMMOZHI and registered the same with the fifth defendant on 27.01.2010; 4.5 4.5 While the plaintiff has set out the details of the script in the plaint at paragraph No.14 thereof, the counter affidavits of the first and fourth defendants do not contain a substantive denial thereof.
by Sekar Reporter · Published January 2, 2026
-
Regret to inform that MrJustice J.Kanakarj passed away today morning.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 9, 2022