Follow:
- Next story W.P.No.6591 of 2021 (Through Video Conferencing) N.ANAND VENKATESH, J. This Court, while passing the earlier order on 30.04.2021, directed the Investigation Officer to take effective steps to complete the investigation and file the final report within a period of six weeks —Taking into consideration the Status Report filed by the Investigation Officer and also the submissions made by the learned Advocate General and the learned State Public Prosecutor, this Court is inclined to extend the time for filing of the final report. Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the Investigation Officer to complete the investigation and file the final report before the concerned jurisdictional Court within a period of six weeks from today. Post this case under the caption ‘for reporting compliance’ on 30.07.2021 at 2.15 p.m.
- Previous story Full order advt tanuja case -THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on Pronounced on 17.06.2021 18.06.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI CRL. O.P. NO. 10387 OF 2021 1. Tanuja Rajan @ Tanuja Kanthula 2. Preeti Rajan .. Petitioners – Vs – 1. State, rep. By Inspector of Police G-7, Chetpet Police Station Chennai 600 031. 2. Bar Council of Tamil Nadu Chennai. .. Respondents (R-2 impleaded vide order of Court dated 15.6.2021) Criminal Original Petition filed u/s 438 Cr.P. C. praying this Court to enlarge the petitioners/accused on bail in the event of arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.192 of 2021 pending investigation before the respondent. For Petitioners : Ms. A.Louisal Ramesh For Respondent : Mr. A.Gopinath, GA (Crl. Side) for R-1 Mr. Haja Mohideen Gisthi for R-2 ORDER Lady Justice is the allegorical personification of the moral force in judicial systems. Her attributes are a blindfold, a beam balance, and a sword and the balance denotes that justice needs to be delivered with eyes closed and ears open. True to the said analogy, which has been followed time immemorial, the justice delivery system in our country is following the same to deliver impartial justice to one and all without reference to any of their personal traits. —In the result, the following orders are passed in this criminal original petition:- i) This criminal original petition, insofar as the 1st petitioner is concerned is dismissed for the reasons aforesaid; ii) Insofar as the 2nd petitioner is concerned, this criminal original petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on her surrendering before the respondent police within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) before the respondent police; iii) The 2nd respondent, in consultation with the Bar Council of India, in the larger interest of the legal fraternity, shall look into the issue of evolving a mechanism for initiation of suo motu proceedings against such of those members, who indulge in activities, which are prejudicial and demeaning the interest of the legal fraternity as a whole; iv) Registry is directed to initiate suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy, Advocate, Supreme Court of India, No.214, New Lawyers Chambers, M.C.Setalwad Block, Supreme Court of India Campus, New Delhi 110 001, by issuing statutory notice; v) After issuing statutory notice to the said Mr.R.Krishnamoorthy, Registry is directed to place the matter before the Hon’ble The Chief Justice for listing the suo motu criminal contempt before the appropriate Bench.
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025
More
Recent Posts
- Quashed Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
- POCSO Act, Coimbatore is set aside. The appellant is acquitted of all the charges under Section 363 of IPC and Section 5(1), 6 of POCSO Act. The bail bond, if any executed by the appellant, shall stand cancelled. Fine amount, if any paid, shall be refunded to the appellant forthwith. 06.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order lok To 1.The learned Principal Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases under POCSO Act, Coimbatore. 2.The Inspector of Police, Race Course Police Station, Coimbatore City, Coimbatore 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok Crl.A.No.151 of 2023 06.06.2025
- Will case Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Appeal Suit No.180 of 2022 & C.M.P.No.6571 of 2022
- Accordingly, these Criminal Appeals stand allowed. The conviction and sentence imposed by the learned Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate at Chengalpattu in in Special S.C.No.8 of 2013, vide the order, dated 19.09.2023 shall stand set aside. The fine amount, if any paid, is ordered to be refunded. 07.07.2025 Neutral Citation : yes/no grs To 1. The Special Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chengalpattu. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption, Chennai City – I, R.A.Puram, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. grs Crl.A.Nos.1186 and 1131 of 2023 07.07.2025 [1] (2023) 16 SCC 141 [2] (2021) 3 SCC 687 [3] AIR 2023 SC 330 [4] (2023) 18 SCC 251 [5] (2014) 13 SCC 55
- This Writ Appeal is therefore, allowed, the order dated 0509.2024 of the learned Sessions Judge in-charge of the Special Court for Trial of Criminal Cases relating to Elected MPs / MLAs is quashed. The matter is remitted to the Presiding Officer. He shall issue notice to the petitioner, hear her objections and thereafter, decide in accordance with law without being influenced by any communication made by the High Court or by the Government. The Officer shall go strictly in terms of the provisions of the related service rules. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (R.S.M., J.) (K.S., J.) 03.07.2025 kkn Internet: Yes Index: No Speaking Neutral Citation : No To:- 1.The Secretary to Government, Home (Courts-VI) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 2.The Secretary to Government, Labour Welfare & Skill Development Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 9. 3.The Registrar General, High Court, Madras. 4.The Sessions Judge, Special Court No.I for Trial of Criminal Cases Relating to elected MPs & MLAs of Tamil Nadu, ‘Singaravelar Maaligai’, Chennai – 1. 5.The Registrar, City Civil Court, Chennai – 1. 6.The Principal Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and K.SURENDER, J. KKN W.P.No. 4478 of 2025 and W.M.P.Nos. 4981 & 4983 of 2025 03.07.2025
