You may also like...
-
-
MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Crl.A(MD)No.39 of 2015? xiv) The Secretary to Government, Home, Excise and Prohibition Department; and the Director General of Police, Chennai, shall give their comments / proposal as to the present case and the further course of action, if any, in view of the fact that ten years have lapsed since the commission of offence. xv) Ways and means to address the issue raised in paragraph no.47(supra) & to effectively overcome the same.
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 8, 2020
-
O.A.Nos.440 to 443 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm.Div) No.150 of 2022 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J trademarks “THALAPPAKATTI” and “THALAPPAKATTI BRIYANI HOTEL” from 1957 and has obtained registrations in respect thereof under class 42 and class 43. It is further stated that the mark was declared as a well known trademark on 22.09.2010. The present action is directed against the video uploaded by the third defendant. After playing the video, learned counsel asserts that the said video tarnishes the reputation of the plaintiff’s trademark and is defamatory. He also points out that the video was uploaded on YouTube and Facebook and that it has had 1.2 million views as evidenced by the document at page 59 of the typed set of papers.
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 4, 2022