You may also like...
-
TAMIL NADU UGC files counter in case against cancellation of arrear exams
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 29, 2020
-
Even if the mortgage made in favour of the applicant / 5th defendant bank by the defendants 3 & 4 is valid in the eye of law, that will not deprive the plaintiffs from claiming their undivided share and interest in the suit property which according to them has been attached to their respective residential flat in the apartment complex. So in all possibilities, I find no reason to reject the plaint on the basis of the averments and allegations made in the plaint. The plaintiffs have established the case and there are also materials available to show that the remedy which has been sought by the plaintiffs before the civil court cannot be effectively addressed before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. So I am of the considered view that the bar under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act cannot be extended to the nature of the claim raised by the applicant/5th defendant in the present suit. In the result, the Application No.3549 of 2022 stands dismissed. 25.09.2023 jrs Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes / No Internet : Yes/No Neutral : Yes/No R.N.MANJULA, J., jrs Application No.3549 of 2022 in C.S.No.97 of 2022 25.09.2023
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 2, 2023
-
Rhea Chakraborty arrives for NCB probe, her lawyer says ‘ready for arrest’
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 6, 2020