sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNRO9kOBD7HT920RXWraEpQcJZ-R6lI38?si=zabce803Z2Zrt7Tv [09/06, 09:06] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court, by judgment dated 05.06.2026 in C.M.A. No.2062 of 2025, allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, holding that the mandatory statutory procedures under the Waqf Act had not been followed. The Court found that the property

[09/06, 09:06] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/UgkxNRO9kOBD7HT920RXWraEpQcJZ-R6lI38?si=zabce803Z2Zrt7Tv
[09/06, 09:06] sekarreporter1: The Madras High Court, by judgment dated 05.06.2026 in C.M.A. No.2062 of 2025, allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the Tamil Nadu Waqf Tribunal, holding that the mandatory statutory procedures under the Waqf Act had not been followed. The Court found that the property was not shown in the statutory List of Auqaf, that there was no material to establish it as a “Waqf by user”, and that the respondents failed to prove the legal basis for treating the property as Waqf. Significantly, the Court held that conducting a survey and issuing the requisite statutory notification are sine qua non before any property can be declared as Waqf, and further observed that mere religious use or the existence of a Dargah, tomb or shrine is not by itself sufficient to confer Waqf status.