Sekarreporter1: ☘️ [3/23, 06:35] Sekarreporter1: *23.3.’21, LAW NOTES:* *Conflict between State Act and Central Act Under List – III* In case where both the State Act and Central Act have been enacted in terms of List – III, the question of repugnancy as envisaged under Article 254 would arise. In that type of cases, it is well settled that in the absence

[3/22, 14:52] Sekarreporter1: ☘️
[3/23, 06:35] Sekarreporter1: *23.3.’21, LAW NOTES:*

*Conflict between State Act and Central Act Under List – III*

In case where both the State Act and Central Act have been enacted in terms of List – III, the question of repugnancy as envisaged under Article 254 would arise. In that type of cases, it is well settled that in the absence of Presidential assent, the Parliamentary Act would prevail.

[(1995) 4 SCC 104]
State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Adhiyaman Educational & Research Institute

[(2004) 9 SCC 755] M.P.Vidyut Karamchari Vs. M.P. Electricity Board

*(To be continued)*