School

s‘Rte Act And Rpwd Act Not Applicable To Sainik Schools’: Madras Hc Upholds Rejection Of Student’S Admission For Failing Medical Fitness Norms ‘RTE Act and RPwD Act not applicable to Sainik Schools’: Madras HC upholds rejection of student’s admission for failing medical fitness norms “Selection and admission to the Sainik School are subject to fulfilling admission criteria, eligibility, rank, merit list, medical fitness, verification of original documents, and such other criteria as may be prescribed by Sainik School Society. Therefore, in the event of an unfit medical report, the Principal is mandated to click the reject button on the e-counselling portal.” Publishedon September 29, 2025By Apoorva Advertisement Madras High Court: A writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the Standard Operating Procedure (‘SOP’) for All India Sainik School Admission Counselling (‘AISSAC’), insofar as it prescribed the eye standards of the SOP for admission to Class VI, was null and void in respect of the petitioner. The petitioner had also sought direction to admit him in Class VI at Sainik School, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District. The Single Judge Bench of G.K.Ilanthiraiyan, J. said that the petitioner, having accepted the SOP for AISSAC and having appeared for the entrance examination, could not subsequently challenge the SOP after receipt of the medical report. It was further held that the provisions of the Right to Education Act and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act were not applicable to the Sainik school, since it was administered under the control of the Sainik School Society and the Ministry of Defence. The Court noted that such schools had been established with the specific purpose of acting as feeder institutes for the National Defence Academy and the Indian Naval Academy. Accordingly, the Court found no infirmity or illegality in the SOP for AISSAC 2025 and held that the writ petition was devoid of merits and liable to be dismissed Background The petitioner had applied for admission to Class VI at Sainik School, Amaravathi Nagar, Udumalpet, Tiruppur District. He had appeared for the entrance examination and secured 227 out of 300 marks, which was well within the cut-off for the Scheduled Caste category. By communication dated 27-06-2025, the Sainik School had directed him to appear before the Medical College Hospital, Coimbatore, for medical fitness verification. The medical board had declared him unfit under Eye Standard-II. On his request for review, he was referred to the Military Hospital, Chennai, where the earlier medical findings were confirmed. The petitioner had argued that the rejection was not on grounds of ineligibility but solely on medical fitness. It was submitted that the petitioner’s vision defect of 6/36 was outside the prescribed standards, and such rejection violated Article 21 of the Constitution as well as Sections 3, 4, and 16 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. He had further contended that the prescription of eye standards in the SOP was discriminatory and liable to be struck down. On the other hand, the respondents had contended that all Sainik Schools were administered under the Sainik Schools Society and the Ministry of Defence, functioning as feeder institutions for the National Defence Academy and Indian Naval Academy. The schools required strict compliance with medical fitness norms, including ocular standards, to ensure candidates’ suitability for future military service. The respondents had further stated that the Right to Education Act and the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, did not apply to such institutions. Analysis and decision The Court observed that Sainik Schools had been established with the primary objective of grooming students for future roles as military officers, with emphasis on both mental and physical readiness. It noted that these institutions functioned as feeder schools for the National Defence Academy and the Indian Naval Academy. Therefore, stringent medical standards, particularly concerning ocular health, had been mandated by the Sainik Schools Society to ensure that candidates met the requisite physical criteria essential for military service. The Court found that although the petitioner had secured sufficient marks, his admission remained subject to eligibility conditions, including medical fitness. The medical examinations conducted at Coimbatore Medical College Hospital and subsequently at the Military Hospital, Chennai, had both declared him unfit. His candidature had, therefore, been rightly rejected by the respondents as per the SOP for AISSAC 2025. The Court further observed that, having accepted the SOP at the time of applying for admission and appearing in the entrance examination, the petitioner could not subsequently challenge its validity after receiving an adverse medical report. It was held that the SOP prescribing eye standards for admission was neither illegal nor discriminatory, given the objective of Sainik Schools to train students for defence services. The Court concluded that the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and the Right to Education Act were not applicable in the present case. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed as being devoid of merits. [M.R.Yajith Krishna v Union of India, W.P.No.29225 of 2025, decided on 22-09-2025] Advocates who appeared in this case: For Petitioner: Mr. R.Saseetharan For Respondents: Mr. K.Ramanamoorthy, Senior Panel Counsel Buy Constitution of India   HERE Related Sainik School denies admission to student for being medically unfit; Uttaranchal High Court dismisses petition seeking admission October 4, 2023 In “Case Briefs” ‘TC is a procedural tool to ensure child’s admission, cannot form basis for denying admission in school or to collect arrear of fees from parents’: Madras HC July 22, 2024 In “Case Briefs” Technicalities Cannot Defeat a Child’s Fundamental Right to Education: Rajasthan High Court September 17, 2025 In “Case Briefs” Tags : admission rejection Madras High Court medical fitness norms ocular standards RPwD Act RTE Act Sainik Schools Leave a comment Post navigation PREVIOUS STORY Protecting Geographical Indications Amidst Climatic Disruptions NEXT STORY Anticipatory bail maintainable only before High Court in absence of prima facie case under SC/ST Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court MOST READ 24 hours 7 days All time Case Briefs High Courts ‘Mere repayment of misappropriated amount does not efface criminal prosecution’; Kerala HC refuses to quash foreign liquor corruption case Case Briefs High Courts Delhi High Court grants relief to CROCS in trade mark dispute; cancels registration of ‘CROOSE’ mark Case Briefs High Courts Orissa HC recognises marriage as traditional necessity; Allows early withdrawal of fixed deposits under National Savings Time Deposit Scheme Events/Webinars News UzAW 2025 | From AI to Cross-Examination, global experts discuss DOs and DON’Ts in International Arbitral Proceedings from an Arbitrator’s Perspective Case Briefs Supreme Court Supreme Court grants interim bail in POCSO case; Orders housing, employment, and counselling support to facilitate convict’s reunion with prosecutrix and minor child Legislation Updates Notifications All India Bar Examination (AIBE-XX) 2025: Check out the Official Schedule Must Watch Watch| Dowry Deaths & the Law: What Legal Remedies Exist? By Editor Law Made Easy | Episode 2: Passport 2.0 – How the E-Passport is Changing Travel Forever By Editor Law Made Easy | Episode 1: Why Your UPI App Feels Different After August 1: NPCI’s New Legal Rules Made Simple By Editor Book Release of Corporate Insolvency: The Road to Viksit Bharat – Law, Policy and Practice By Editor Join The Discussion Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Subscribe to our Newsletter Get weekly latest news and updates in your e-mail News Submissions blog@scconline.com Article Submissions articles@scconline.com Download SCC Online App for Android Users/IOS Users Disclaimer : The content of this Blog are for informational purposes only and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. The views expressed are not the personal views of EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. and do not constitute legal advice. The contents are intended, but not guaranteed, to be correct, complete, or up to date. EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. disclaims all liability to any person for any loss or damage caused by errors or