Sc super specality mbbs course full order
[11/27, 17:24] Sekarreporter1: 1
ITEM NO.1509 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).12891/2020
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-10-2020
in W.A No.1302/2020 passed by the High Court Of Kerala At
Ernakulam)
DR. PRERIT SHARMA & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
DR. BILU B.S. & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
SLP(C) Nos.13670-13672/2020
W.P.(C) No.1299/2020
Date : 27-11-2020 These matters were called on for pronouncement of
order today.
For the parties: Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Anshula Laroiya, Adv
Mr. Vinayak Bhandari, Adv
Mr. Shivendra Singh, AOR
Mr. C.S. Vaidhyanathan,Sr. Adv
Mr. V.Giri,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Vijay Narayan, Sr.Adv.
Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna,AOR
Mr. Raja Rajeswaran,Sr.Adv.
Mr. Aditya Chada,Adv.
Mr. George Varghese, Adv.
Mr. Perumpallikuttiyil, Adv.
Mr. Manu Srinath, Adv.
Mr. A Selvin Raja, AOR
Ms. Priyanka Prakash, Adv.
Ms. Beena Prakash,Adv.
Mr. G.Prakash, AOR
Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker,Adv.
Mr. Balendu Shekhar,Adv.
Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR
Mr. P.Wilson,Sr.Adv.
[11/27, 17:25] Sekarreporter1: 2
Mr. G.Sankaran,Adv
Mr. K.V.Jagdishvaran,Adv.
Ms. G.Indira,AOR
Ms. Rangoli Seth,Adv.
Mr. Krishnakumar RS, Adv.
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, AOR
Hon’ble Mr.Justice L.Nageswara Rao pronounced
the non-reportable order of the Bench comprising His
Lordship, Hon’ble Mr.Justice Hemant Gupta and Hon’ble
Mr.Justice Ajay Rastogi.
Leave granted.
We make it clear that we have not expressed
any opinion on the validity of GOMS No.462 of
07.11.2020. We direct that the counselling for
admission to Super Specialty Medical Courses for the
academic year 2020-2021 shall proceed on a date to be
fixed by the competent authority without providing for
reservations to in-service doctors for the academic
year 2020-2021. We reiterate that the above direction
would be operative only for the current academic year
i.e. 2020-2021.
List the Appeals and the Writ Petition for
hearing in February, 2021.
(B.Parvathi) (Anand Prakash)
Court Master Court Master
(Signed non-reportable order is placed on the file)
![[12/14, 11:09] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1735172461468258509?t=uFGhjja4_nzg_MSdO2qrNQ&s=08 [12/14, 11:13] sekarreporter1: The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that despite the fact that the petitioner paid entire tax due and interest, their application came to be rejected by the first respondent/Interim Board for Settlement II on 15.09.2023 for the reason that the petitioner had filed the application without payment of tax and interest on the income disclosed as mandated under the provisions of section 245 C (1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. 2.2 The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner contended that the grievance of the petitioner is that though the petitioner had paid entire amount of tax liability along with interest, the first respondent refused to entertain the application, without even making any reference to the payments made by the petitioner, as described in the above tabulated column, and hence, the petitioner made an application to rectify the mistake to the 1st respondent by virtue of application dated 29.09.2023 wherein, the petitioner had disclosed the payments details made by them on different dates and modes of payment, however, the same has not been considered by the first respondent and by means of the impugned order, the application has been rejected, which necessitated the petitioner to approach this Court by way of filing this Writ Petition.](https://sekarreporter.com/wp-content/themes/hueman/assets/front/img/thumb-medium-empty.png)
