Follow:
- Next story Mgr.university Vc Suda sesaiya lecture tomorrow evening 5.30 mhc advt J.Ravindran cisco webx meeting click video www.Sekarreporter.com
- Previous story 6/29, 12:09] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1277491799519424512?s=08 [6/29, 12:09] Sekarreporter 1: Madurai East MLA – Moorthy from DMK Party has approached the Madras High Court for Anticipatory Bail In Crl.O.P.(MD)6748 Of 2020. For State- State Public Prosecutor A.Natarajan appeared and argued that • A Case has been registered in Oomachikulam Police Station in Crime No.521 Of 2020. The case is that the DMK MLA has threatened one Sankarapandi for the Facebook publication made by him. • The Entire threatening video has been recorded in CCTV.
Recent Posts
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira said, crimes of such nature were on the increase in and around Chennai due to lack of awareness among the people and therefore, it was incumbent upon the State to warn them by publicising the modus operandi adopted by the fradusters.
- Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.
- 28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it
- உதவி ஆணையராக இருந்த வெள்ளதுரை உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு மாநில மனித உரிமை ஆணையம் அபராதம் விதித்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து
- Justice M Dhandapani of the Madurai bench made the observation in a plea seeking to quash the FIR registered against a group of men who were demonstrating against the police inaction in a matter of the death of one Silambarasan due to police brutality.
More
Recent Posts
- Justice A.D. Jagadish Chandira said, crimes of such nature were on the increase in and around Chennai due to lack of awareness among the people and therefore, it was incumbent upon the State to warn them by publicising the modus operandi adopted by the fradusters.
- Today, the Writ Appeals filed by the State challenging an order of the High Court quashing G.O. 721 which was issued by the AIADMK government to hand over files of the Regupathy Commission of Inquiry to the DVAC were permitted to be withdrawn by a Hon’ble Division Bench comprising of Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Suresh Kumar & Hon’ble Mr. Justice Kumaresh Babu.
- 28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: AIR 1971 SC 803 : surla vs state of haryana : supreme court will not interfere with sentence of punishment unless it is established that the sentence is harsh or unjust in the facts and circumstances of the case[28/03, 10:15] Vinothpandian: 2004 (3) RCR ( criminal ) 855 SC : maulavi hussain haji abraham.umarji vs state of gujarat : while interpreting a provision the court only interprets the law and cannot legislate it
- உதவி ஆணையராக இருந்த வெள்ளதுரை உள்ளிட்டோருக்கு மாநில மனித உரிமை ஆணையம் அபராதம் விதித்து பிறப்பித்த உத்தரவை ரத்து
- Justice M Dhandapani of the Madurai bench made the observation in a plea seeking to quash the FIR registered against a group of men who were demonstrating against the police inaction in a matter of the death of one Silambarasan due to police brutality.