Sasikala property attached video

You may also like...

• 

  Arms act aquital sc full order of full bench

  December 15, 2021

   by Sekar Reporter · Published December 15, 2021

• 

  Former judge ap sha full speech video ww.sekarreporter .com

  May 6, 2020

   by Sekar Reporter · Published May 6, 2020

• 

  already held by this court, the first respondent, who recorded the reasons for reopening the assessment under section 148(2), has no jurisdiction over the appellant, to issue notice dated 28.03.2018 under section 148(1). Though the files pertaining to the reassessment proceedings of the appellant were transferred, the second respondent has no authority to continue the reassessment proceedings under section 129 and hence, the notice dated 14.12.2018 issued by him is also held to be invalid. The invalid notices so issued by the respondents vitiate the entire reassessment proceedings initiated against the appellant. Admittedly, no notice under section 148 was issued by the second respondent, who is the jurisdictional assessing officer, for reassessment of the return of income of the appellant, within the time frame stipulated under the Act. In this case, the limitation period of six years for reopening the assessment for the year 2011-12 under section 147 of the Act, came to an end on 31.03.2018. In such circumstances, there is no requirement for this court to go into the other issue based on the factual matrix projected by the appellant i.e., whether the appellant has disclosed fully and truly all the material particulars that are necessary for assessment for the relevant assessment year. In the ultimate analysis, the writ appeal stands allowed by setting aside the notices impugned in the writ petition and the order impugned herein. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.  (R.M.D., J.)         (J.S.N.P., J.)          27.06.2022

  July 1, 2022

   by Sekar Reporter · Published July 1, 2022