Follow:
- Next story Today family cout tips Divorce on ground of adultery – Burden of proof was on the respondent to prove the adultery – In case of adultery, the adulterer is a necessary party to the proceedings. (Madras)mhc C. Saravanan, J. C.M.A.No. 1951 of 2009 and M.P.No. 1 of 2009. D/d. 08.01.2020.
- Previous story Ram Sankar Bci Advt: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA F. No.06/Judl./2020 13th May, 2020 C I R C U L A R It is notified for the information of all concerned that considering the medical advice, as a precautionary measure to
Recent Posts
- quashed an ECIR against former DGP MS Jaffar Sait in a money laundering case, holding that the Madras High Court erred by rehearing the matter after having already allowed his quashing petition, without issuing notice to the parties.
- Justice L. Victoria Gowri, Madras High Court, Madurai Bench The Madras High Court held that the conferment of Scheduled Caste (SC) communal status to the one who is Christian is a fraud on the Constitution
- ஜனாதிபதி மற்றும் கவர்னருக்கு கால வரம்பு நிர்ணயம் செய்ய முடியுமா என்று 14 கேள்விகளுடன் உச்ச நீதிமன்றத்திடம் ஜனாதிபதி திரவுபதி முர்மு விளக்கம் கேட்டுள்ளார். இதற்கு உச்சநீதிமன்ற அரசியல் சாசன பெஞ்ச் நாளை விளக்கம்
- முதல்வர. கண்டனம்
- CBFC, Shri. K.RAMANAMOORTHY Senior Central Government appeared and circulated the details of Objectionable portion was deleted and replaced. During the court proceedings, the song in question was played in open court on behalf of Respondents 3 and 4. However, the petitioner’s side has made objections to the tune, requesting it be muted.
More
Recent Posts
- quashed an ECIR against former DGP MS Jaffar Sait in a money laundering case, holding that the Madras High Court erred by rehearing the matter after having already allowed his quashing petition, without issuing notice to the parties.
- Justice L. Victoria Gowri, Madras High Court, Madurai Bench The Madras High Court held that the conferment of Scheduled Caste (SC) communal status to the one who is Christian is a fraud on the Constitution
- ஜனாதிபதி மற்றும் கவர்னருக்கு கால வரம்பு நிர்ணயம் செய்ய முடியுமா என்று 14 கேள்விகளுடன் உச்ச நீதிமன்றத்திடம் ஜனாதிபதி திரவுபதி முர்மு விளக்கம் கேட்டுள்ளார். இதற்கு உச்சநீதிமன்ற அரசியல் சாசன பெஞ்ச் நாளை விளக்கம்
- முதல்வர. கண்டனம்
- CBFC, Shri. K.RAMANAMOORTHY Senior Central Government appeared and circulated the details of Objectionable portion was deleted and replaced. During the court proceedings, the song in question was played in open court on behalf of Respondents 3 and 4. However, the petitioner’s side has made objections to the tune, requesting it be muted.
