You may also like...
-
-
Facilitating late-filing of Income Tax returns is service: Madras HC upholds Section 234 (F) of IT Act prescribing Fee for default in timely filing of returns Chief Justice AP Sahi and Subramonium Prasad, however, disagreed. Rather, the Court found merit in the arguments advanced by the State authorities that the “service” involved is facility allowing late-payers to file their income returns beyond the prescribed date. As stated in the judgmentAdvocate S Santhosh appeared for the petitioner. Additional Solicitor General G Rajagopalan appeared for the Union of India and Advocate Hema Muralikrishnan appeared for the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
by Sekar Reporter · Published February 8, 2020
-
W.P.No.32672 of 2019 W.P.No.32672 of 2019 THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and P.D.AUDIKESAVALU, J. (Made by the Hon’ble Chief
by Sekar Reporter · Published September 14, 2021
