Follow:
- Next story Tomorrow former cm jayalathia birthday
- Previous story The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has ruled that under Rule 15 A of the Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955, the Head of the Department has the authority to exercise suo motu power of review after an order is passed by a subordinate authority. After a larger Bench was constituted by the Chief Justice to resolve the issue following conflicting judgments by different Division Benches of the High Court, a Full Bench, comprising Justices S.S. Sundar, R. Subramanian and N. Sathish Kumar, answered the referred question in the affirmative.
Recent Posts
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy said the court was not expert on the matter. The judge however directed the petitioner to make an application before the regional joint commissioner of HR and CE department in two weeks, with directions to the officer to take a decision
- June 1 ist day cause list link
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy observed that from the affidavit filed by the collector, it appears that she was busy with the electoral roll and other matters, she deputed the district revenue officer to conduct an enquiry. The procedure adopted by the collector to depute some other official to hear the objections, and thereafter passing an order based on oral interaction with the DRO is absolutely illegal and incorrect. The judge observed that neither the Tasmac nor the women’s association can defame the state as if robberies are taking place. False reasons have been submitted before the collector and that too defaming the state and its people.
- 08:50] sekarreporter1: https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] sekarreporter1: The Legal Affair Let’s talk Law
- https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] Meta AI: *Case #40: _Use of Children in Election Campaigns_ | Madras HC | 26.05.2026* _Justice N. Anand Venkatesh_. *RP Act 1951 + Child Rights + Art 21 + Corrupt Practice*. *HJS Election Law, Law Officer – MCC, UPSC GS-2*
More
Recent Posts
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy said the court was not expert on the matter. The judge however directed the petitioner to make an application before the regional joint commissioner of HR and CE department in two weeks, with directions to the officer to take a decision
- June 1 ist day cause list link
- Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy observed that from the affidavit filed by the collector, it appears that she was busy with the electoral roll and other matters, she deputed the district revenue officer to conduct an enquiry. The procedure adopted by the collector to depute some other official to hear the objections, and thereafter passing an order based on oral interaction with the DRO is absolutely illegal and incorrect. The judge observed that neither the Tasmac nor the women’s association can defame the state as if robberies are taking place. False reasons have been submitted before the collector and that too defaming the state and its people.
- 08:50] sekarreporter1: https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] sekarreporter1: The Legal Affair Let’s talk Law
- https://thelegalaffair.com/news/madras-high-court-flags-use-of-children-in-election-campaigns-while-examining-alleged-corrupt-practices-in-tamil-nadu-polls/ [31/05, 08:50] Meta AI: *Case #40: _Use of Children in Election Campaigns_ | Madras HC | 26.05.2026* _Justice N. Anand Venkatesh_. *RP Act 1951 + Child Rights + Art 21 + Corrupt Practice*. *HJS Election Law, Law Officer – MCC, UPSC GS-2*