You may also like...
-
In the light of the finding recorded above and the observation made in regard to the manner and purpose of alienation, nothing more is required to be directed. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a clarification that the property of the temple would not be considered as property of the HR & CE Department and its alienation would be as per the provision of Section 34 of the Act of 1959. There will be no order as to costs. (M.N.B., CJ.) (N.M., J.) 11.08.2022
by Sekar Reporter · Published August 13, 2022
-
Legal Eagles Elites presents MASTER SERIES – Online Intensive Coaching for APP / CJ/ DJ – Aspirants / Advocates / Law
by Sekar Reporter · Published October 20, 2021
-
Sekarreporter1: [11/19, 10:42] Sekarreporter1: [11/19, 09:50] Judge Suthantheram: Sekar, Why you started posting matters of caste or political issues. I mean about petition against Jaibeam film by one Arulmozhi. This is not legal issue or court matter. This is only for you not for posting in the group
by Sekar Reporter · Published November 19, 2021