SEKAR REPORTER Blog

In the result in view of the majority Judgment, the reference:- “Whether the occupied grama natham lands vest with the Government and thereby the provisions of the Land Encroachment Act 1905 can be invoked in respect of occupied grama natham lands?” is answered that: “The occupied grama natham lands do not vest with the Government and thereby the provisions of the Land Encroachment Act 1905 cannot be invoked in respect of occupied grama natham lands.” 153.  The Writ Petitions and Writ Appeals may be listed before the appropriate Courts for orders in accordance with the answer given by us in the reference.  [C.V.K.J.,]     [P.T.A.J.,]     [K.K.R.K.J.,] 06.03.2026 vsg Index:  Yes/No Internet:  Yes/No Speaking / Non Speaking Order To 1.               The District Collector Dindigul District Dindigul. 2.               The Revenue Divisional Officer Palani Tlauk, Dindigul District. 3.               The Tahsildar Vedasandur Taluk Vedasandur, Dindigul District. 4.               The Block Development Officer cum Executive Officer Kujioliyamparai Panchayat Union Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. Madurai – 625 001. C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J., AND P.T.ASHA, J., AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. vsg Pre-Delivery Order made in W.P.Nos. 19720 of 2017, 8855, 18441, 18436, 16605, 20083, 21072, 28927, 25142, 22162 & 21323 of 2025 06.03.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on : 08.12.2025 Pronounced On : 06.03.2026                    CORAM:  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE  C.V.KARTHIKEYAN THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE  P.T.ASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.3376 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.3794 of 2026 B.Shajimon .. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, Department of School Education and Literacy, Represented by its Secretary, Education Department, 122-C, Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendraprasad Road, New Delhi – 110 001. 2. The Central Board of Secondary Education, Represented by its Secretary, CBSE Integrated Office Complex, Sector – 23, Phase – 1,

2026:MHC:821 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.02.2026 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.3376 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.3794 of 2026 B.Shajimon .. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[Supreme Court hears a PIL]  CJI Surya Kant: Have you drafted the plea?  Petitioner: Yes myself. I can deposit my phone here.   CJI: What is your background ?  Petitioner: 12th pass  CJI: which school?  Petitioner: Sanatan Dharm school, Ludhiana  CJI: I will arrange an English exam here in court..if you score 30 marks.. I will see it then  Petitioner: yes yes I can  CJI: either you tell the truth or we impose huge costs and order probe  Petitioner: You can see my phone.   CJI: what does fiduciary risk to corporate donors etc that you have written.. what does it mean?  Adv: I can refer to the plea  CJI: I am asking last time which lawyer drafted it. You have not done it.   Adv: I have searched AI Tools. I also gifted 4 jackets to a typist.. and he charged 1000 per hour for typing.. Das sir.   CJI: Supreme Court typist made the petition. Call the typist here.

[Supreme Court hears a PIL] CJI Surya Kant: Have you drafted the plea? Petitioner: Yes myself. I can deposit my phone here. CJI: What is your background ? Petitioner: 12th pass CJI: which school? Petitioner: Sanatan Dharm school, Ludhiana CJI: I will arrange an English exam here in court..if you score 30 marks.. I will see it then Petitioner: yes yes I can CJI: either you tell the truth or we impose huge costs and order probe Petitioner: You can see my phone. CJI: what does fiduciary risk to corporate donors etc that you have written.. what does it mean? Adv: I can refer to the plea CJI: I am asking last time which lawyer drafted it. You have not done it. Adv: I have searched AI Tools. I also gifted 4 jackets to a typist.. and he charged 1000 per hour for typing.. Das sir. CJI: Supreme Court typist made the petition. Call the typist here.

[Supreme Court hears a PIL] CJI Surya Kant: Have you drafted the plea? Petitioner: Yes myself. I can deposit my phone here. CJI: What is your background ? Petitioner: 12th pass CJI: which school?...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( civil ) no 12081 – 12082 of 2023 with contempt petitions 198 – 199 of 2024 dated 9th sep 2024 : M/ S sitaram enterprises vs Prithviraj vardichand jain : failure of tenant to handover possession to the landlord despite directions by Supreme court is guilty of contempt of court

Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( civil ) no 12081 – 12082 of 2023 with contempt petitions 198 – 199 of 2024 dated 9th sep 2024 : M/ S sitaram enterprises vs Prithviraj vardichand jain : failure of tenant to handover possession to the landlord despite directions by Supreme court is guilty of contempt of court

Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( civil ) no 12081 – 12082 of 2023 with contempt petitions 198 – 199 of 2024 dated 9th sep 2024 : M/ S sitaram enterprises vs Prithviraj vardichand...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( civil ) no 12081 – 12082 of 2023 with contempt petitions 198 – 199 of 2024 dated 9th sep 2024 : M/ S sitaram enterprises vs Prithviraj vardichand jain : failure of tenant to handover possession to the landlord despite directions by Supreme court is guilty of contempt of court

Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( civil ) no 12081 – 12082 of 2023 with contempt petitions 198 – 199 of 2024 dated 9th sep 2024 : M/ S sitaram enterprises vs Prithviraj vardichand jain : failure of tenant to handover possession to the landlord despite directions by Supreme court is guilty of contempt of court

[10/03, 13:18] Vinothpandian: Supreme court : SLP ( civil ) no 12081 – 12082 of 2023 with contempt petitions 198 – 199 of 2024 dated 9th sep 2024 : M/ S sitaram enterprises vs...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

[10/03, 13:14] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan decide to hear on March 17, 2026 a batch of three writ petitions, including the one filed by anti corruption organisation Arappor Iyakkam alleing a loss of ₹397 crore to the public exchequer, due to collusive bidding, in procurement of electricity transformers during the tenure of V. Senthilbalaji as the Minister for Electricity between 2021 and 2023 @THChenna [10/03, 13:14] sekarreporter1: 👍

[10/03, 13:14] sekarreporter1: #MadrasHighCourt Chief Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice G. Arul Murugan decide to hear on March 17, 2026 a batch of three writ petitions, including the one filed by anti corruption...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version