SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Judge Baratha Chakravarthy / I agree with the Learned Counsel for the Workman that the delay will impact the Workman. However, I cannot undertake the exercise myself in this case due to the complexity of the charges, which involve many factual aspects, and the 103 documents marked on behalf of the respondent Management by consent that must be considered. Therefore, I cannot uphold the award of the first respondent authority

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED: 19-02-2026   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY   W.P.No.20688 of 2023, W.P.No.20691 OF 2023 & W.M.P.No.20045 of 2023, W.M.P.No.20048 OF 2023...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

In the present case, the colonial practise, since abolished long before, in practice it is continuing. Thus, Government is duty bound to work out modalities to enforce their own policy decision, if necessary by initiating suitable actions not only against the District Collectors but also against the police officials, who all are not functioning in tune with the Government policies and instructions, which is the duty mandated on them under the Constitution as well as under the Service Rules. 4.               Post the matter on 23.03.2026. (S.M.S.,J.)      (K.S.,J.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP Crl. No. 472 of 2025 A.Radhakrishnan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.    ...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

N senthil kumar judge /(3)The judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.470 of 1986, dated 12.09.2002 passed by the Principal District Munsif, Sankarankovil, is hereby set aside.

2026:MHC:834 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON :  20.02.2026 PRONOUNCED ON : 27.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.R.P.(MD)Nos.3025 and 3419 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.17120 and 18546 of 2025 C.R..P(MD)No.3025...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

In the result in view of the majority Judgment, the reference:- “Whether the occupied grama natham lands vest with the Government and thereby the provisions of the Land Encroachment Act 1905 can be invoked in respect of occupied grama natham lands?” is answered that: “The occupied grama natham lands do not vest with the Government and thereby the provisions of the Land Encroachment Act 1905 cannot be invoked in respect of occupied grama natham lands.” 153.  The Writ Petitions and Writ Appeals may be listed before the appropriate Courts for orders in accordance with the answer given by us in the reference.  [C.V.K.J.,]     [P.T.A.J.,]     [K.K.R.K.J.,] 06.03.2026 vsg Index:  Yes/No Internet:  Yes/No Speaking / Non Speaking Order To 1.               The District Collector Dindigul District Dindigul. 2.               The Revenue Divisional Officer Palani Tlauk, Dindigul District. 3.               The Tahsildar Vedasandur Taluk Vedasandur, Dindigul District. 4.               The Block Development Officer cum Executive Officer Kujioliyamparai Panchayat Union Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District. Madurai – 625 001. C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J., AND P.T.ASHA, J., AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. vsg Pre-Delivery Order made in W.P.Nos. 19720 of 2017, 8855, 18441, 18436, 16605, 20083, 21072, 28927, 25142, 22162 & 21323 of 2025 06.03.2026

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Reserved on : 08.12.2025 Pronounced On : 06.03.2026                    CORAM:  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE  C.V.KARTHIKEYAN THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE  P.T.ASHA AND THE HONOURABLE MR....

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.3376 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.3794 of 2026 B.Shajimon .. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, Department of School Education and Literacy, Represented by its Secretary, Education Department, 122-C, Shastri Bhavan, Dr.Rajendraprasad Road, New Delhi – 110 001. 2. The Central Board of Secondary Education, Represented by its Secretary, CBSE Integrated Office Complex, Sector – 23, Phase – 1,

2026:MHC:821 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.02.2026 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.3376 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.3794 of 2026 B.Shajimon .. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version