SEKAR REPORTER Blog

The Madras High Court has reaffirmed in a recent appeal case, ACE Foods Ltd v The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr (2026), that a trademark cannot be deemed abandoned simply based on the party’s delay in filing an affidavit of evidence.

The Madras High Court has reaffirmed in a recent appeal case, ACE Foods Ltd v The Registrar of Trade Marks & Anr (2026), that a trademark cannot be deemed abandoned simply based on the party’s delay in filing an affidavit of evidence.

[11/03, 07:57] sekarreporter1:  Law Asia ABLJ CBLJ Register Login Subscribe Resources Awards gallery A-List lawyers Law firm directory Sections Topics Law.asia home Archive .TV Awards CBLJ Forum•Shanghai 2025 Events Jobs About us Contact...

Advocate Sc Arasu: Mylapore permanent fund nidhi case. Devanathan’sBail petition dismissed in Supreme court Supreme Court Says No to Bail; Asset Auction to Continue in Devanathan Case Date: 9 March 2026Court: Supreme Court of India, Court No. 8Case: SLP (Criminal) No. 3801 of 2026Judges: Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma What the case was about 🔹 Devanathan Yadav filed an appeal in the Supreme Court asking for bail. This was his second effective attempt in the Supreme Court. Earlier, one petition had been withdrawn.

[10/03, 20:31] Advocate Sc Arasu: Mylapore permanent fund nidhi case. Devanathan’sBail petition dismissed in Supreme court Supreme Court Says No to Bail; Asset Auction to Continue in Devanathan Case Date: 9 March 2026Court: Supreme...

Judge Baratha Chakravarthy / I agree with the Learned Counsel for the Workman that the delay will impact the Workman. However, I cannot undertake the exercise myself in this case due to the complexity of the charges, which involve many factual aspects, and the 103 documents marked on behalf of the respondent Management by consent that must be considered. Therefore, I cannot uphold the award of the first respondent authority

  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS   DATED: 19-02-2026   CORAM   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY   W.P.No.20688 of 2023, W.P.No.20691 OF 2023 & W.M.P.No.20045 of 2023, W.M.P.No.20048 OF 2023...

In the present case, the colonial practise, since abolished long before, in practice it is continuing. Thus, Government is duty bound to work out modalities to enforce their own policy decision, if necessary by initiating suitable actions not only against the District Collectors but also against the police officials, who all are not functioning in tune with the Government policies and instructions, which is the duty mandated on them under the Constitution as well as under the Service Rules. 4.               Post the matter on 23.03.2026. (S.M.S.,J.)      (K.S.,J.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP Crl. No. 472 of 2025 A.Radhakrishnan ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1.    ...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com