SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

[13/03, 11:00] sekarreporter1: [13/03, 10:59] sekarreporter1: SUN TV VS CSK ITEM 1 LIST 2 SKRJ [13/03, 10:59] sekarreporter1: 👍 [13/03, 11:00] sekarreporter1: Sun TV Network Limited has filed a civil suit in the #MadrasHighCourt to restrain Chennai Super Kings Limited from the using the songs from Rajinikanth starrer Jailer, Coolie and Jailer 2 in their promos. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamurthy is scheduled to hear the television network’s inteirm injunction plea today @THChennai

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 13, 2026

[13/03, 11:00] sekarreporter1: [13/03, 10:59] sekarreporter1: SUN TV VS CSK ITEM 1 LIST 2 SKRJ [13/03, 10:59] sekarreporter1: 👍 [13/03, 11:00] sekarreporter1: Sun TV Network Limited has filed a civil suit in the #MadrasHighCourt to restrain Chennai Super Kings Limited from the using the songs from Rajinikanth starrer Jailer, Coolie and Jailer 2 in their promos. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamurthy is scheduled to hear the television network’s inteirm injunction plea today @THChennai

[13/03, 11:00] sekarreporter1: [13/03, 10:59] sekarreporter1: SUN TV VS CSK ITEM 1 LIST 2 SKRJ [13/03, 10:59] sekarreporter1: 👍 [13/03, 11:00] sekarreporter1: Sun TV Network Limited has filed a civil suit in the #MadrasHighCourt...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Creamy Layer Cannot Be Determined Solely On Income; Social Status Of Parents Must Also Be Considered In UPSC OBC Claims: Supreme Court https://share.google/pSe35NUTfXjKh2fsI [13/03, 08:40] sekarreporter1: menu_bar Verdictum Workplace Home > Court Updates > Supreme Court > Creamy Layer Cannot Be… Creamy Layer Cannot Be Determined

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 13, 2026

Creamy Layer Cannot Be Determined Solely On Income; Social Status Of Parents Must Also Be Considered In UPSC OBC Claims: Supreme Court https://share.google/pSe35NUTfXjKh2fsI [13/03, 08:40] sekarreporter1: menu_bar Verdictum Workplace Home > Court Updates > Supreme Court > Creamy Layer Cannot Be… Creamy Layer Cannot Be Determined

[13/03, 08:40] sekarreporter1: Creamy Layer Cannot Be Determined Solely On Income; Social Status Of Parents Must Also Be Considered In UPSC OBC Claims: Supreme Court https://share.google/pSe35NUTfXjKh2fsI [13/03, 08:40] sekarreporter1: menu_bar Verdictum Workplace Home >...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
[13/03, 08:31] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2032290702051459252 [13/03, 08:31] sekarreporter1: Central Govt Counsels welcoming CJ along with ASG, Adv Kumaraguru , Adv Babu, Adv Chandrasekar & Adv srinivasamurthy and othwrs

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 13, 2026

[13/03, 08:31] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2032290702051459252 [13/03, 08:31] sekarreporter1: Central Govt Counsels welcoming CJ along with ASG, Adv Kumaraguru , Adv Babu, Adv Chandrasekar & Adv srinivasamurthy and othwrs

[13/03, 08:31] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2032290702051459252 [13/03, 08:31] sekarreporter1: Central Govt Counsels welcoming CJ along with ASG, Adv Kumaraguru , Adv Babu, Adv Chandrasekar & Adv srinivasamurthy and othwrs

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 12, 2026

Land mark order bench comprising Justice PS Narasimha and Justice R Mahadevan granted relief to several UPSC candidates, who were denied appointments despite clearing the Civil Service Examinations, as they were wrongly included in the creamy layer category.

In an important judgment, the Supreme Court has held that ‘creamy layer’ status for reservation under the Other Backward Classes (OBC) category cannot be determined solely on the basis of parental income, without reference...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 12, 2026

Former Acting chief justice T Raja. Excellent arguments in sc.

2026 INSC 230                                                                                                                                                                                                             REPORTABLE   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION   CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2827 – 2829 of 2018                     UNION OF...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 12, 2026

MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)No.16667 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)No.13283 of 2017 C.Gomathy … Petitioner .Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, Thuckalay Kanyakumari District. 2.The Tahsildar, Vilavancode Taluk,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :04.03.2026 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P(MD)No.16667 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD)No.13283 of 2017 C.Gomathy … Petitioner .Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, Thuckalay...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published March 12, 2026

Senior Counsels Guru Krishna Kumar and Madhavi Divan along with Mr. Naveen Kumar Murthi* Advocate, represented the Appellants (direct recruits) in the matter before the Supreme Court and the Hon’ble Court was pleased to concur with their arguments and held that seniority of Direct Recruits ought to be counted from the date of their initial appointment and not

[12/03, 17:31] sekarreporter1: http://youtube.com/post/Ugkx0-QPRRhKRcePIRQBVns7h1A5L6vJj_hy?si=AWrZ5UaGA4k7SjCV [12/03, 17:31] sekarreporter1: “: In a major dispute of seniority among the Direct Recruits and the Internal candidates in the TNEB, *Senior Counsels Guru Krishna Kumar and Madhavi Divan along...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version