SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Supreme Court now requires parties seeking adjournments to disclose reasons and prior adjournments, and the other side can object.

Supreme Court now requires parties seeking adjournments to disclose reasons and prior adjournments, and the other side can object.

[19/03, 11:43] sekarreporter1: New adjournment norms at Supreme Court: Reasons, past adjournments must be disclosed; opposing side can object | https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/new-adjournment-norms-at-supreme-court-reasons-past-adjournments-must-be-disclosed-opposing-side-can-object [19/03, 11:43] Meta AI: Supreme Court now requires parties seeking adjournments to disclose...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR W.P.Crl.No.556 of 2026 and W.P.M.P. Crl. No. 171 of 2026 Selvakumar                                  … Petitioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.03.2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR W.P.Crl.No.556 of 2026 and W.P.M.P. Crl. No. 171 of 2026 Selvakumar                                  … Petitioner Vs. 1.The Director General of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Justice N Anand Venkatesh and Justice P Dhanabal was hearing a habeas corpus petition filed by a man seeking to produce the body of his wife and two kids, aged 3.5 years and 2 years, who were missing since March 6, 2026.

The Madras High Court recently observed that no remedy under a habeas corpus petition would lie for the disappearance of a wife, who actually eloped with another man. The bench of Justice N Anand Venkatesh and Justice...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

lock and sealOrder of the Court was made by the Hon’ble Chief Justice) In this public interest litigation seeking to address the issue of illegal resorts/farm houses run in the Sathyamangalam Tiger Reserve Forest

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.13711 of 2022  and  WMP N   os.  4739, 7882, 7883,  7933   of 2026, 12992   of...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Judge p t asha Consequently, the order dated 09.01.2026 is set aside and the writ petition is allowed.   The respondents are directed to extend the benefit of Maternity Leave to the writ petitioner as per her entitlement especially for the period between 15.04.2026 to 14.04.2027 with all attendant and service benefits.  No costs.  Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 09-03-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-03-2026 CORAM THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA WP No.9023 of 2026 AND WMP No. 9744 OF 2026 S.Sumaya Rahamath W/o.Abuthahir Secondary Grade Teacher Panchayat...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Mmba /) CONVENOR 8) EXECUTIVE MEMBERS [8 Numbers of which 3 shall be the women]* Eligibility criteria for Contestants in Election As per the Bye-Law of MMBA, the eligibility criteria for the candidates contesting in the election have been fixed as follows:

Mmba /) CONVENOR 8) EXECUTIVE MEMBERS [8 Numbers of which 3 shall be the women]* Eligibility criteria for Contestants in Election As per the Bye-Law of MMBA, the eligibility criteria for the candidates contesting in the election have been fixed as follows:

[18/03, 21:57] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/i/status/2034304808958710114 [18/03, 22:03] sekarreporter1: [18/03, 22:02] sekarreporter1: Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Bar Association (Regd) MMBA Lawyers Chambers Buildings, 1 st Floor, Madurai- 625 023 Phone: 0452-2433344Email: mmbamadurai@mail.com The Annual...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Bank Cannot Remit Funds Contrary To Customer Mandate: Supreme Court Upholds Madras HC Ruling Against Canara Bank https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/bank-cannot-make-unauthorized-remittance-to-third-party-without-customer-instructions-supreme-court-526760

Bank Cannot Remit Funds Contrary To Customer Mandate: Supreme Court Upholds Madras HC Ruling Against Canara Bank https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/bank-cannot-make-unauthorized-remittance-to-third-party-without-customer-instructions-supreme-court-526760

Bank Cannot Remit Funds Contrary To Customer Mandate: Supreme Court Upholds Madras HC Ruling Against Canara Bank https://www.livelawbiz.com/top-stories/bank-cannot-make-unauthorized-remittance-to-third-party-without-customer-instructions-supreme-court-526760

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version