SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

Thus, the writ order dated 28.10.2020 in WP.No.40412 of 2005 is set aside and Writ Appeal is allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. (S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J.)(C.KUMARAPPAN J.) 15-12-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No   To 1.S.Somasundaram(deceased)1.Mrs.R ukmani W/o.Late Somasundaram, 2/821D, The Golden City, Meenakshi Nagar East, Kanankkam Palayam, P.Nallur, Thiruppur 641 666. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Deputy Secretary to the Government, Public(Political Pension) Department, Fort st. George, Madras 600 009. 3.The District Collector Coimbatore Collectorate, Coimbatore.  S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN J. gd WA No. 806 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WA No. 806 of 2022 1. The Government Of India Rep....

Uncategorized

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 30639 of 2025 and WMP No. 45563 of 2025 V.Anand Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Secretary to Government Co-Operative Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600009. 2.The Commissioner Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies Election Commission, No.273, Kamadhenu Supermarket, Anna Salai, Chennai-2. 3.The Secretary Tamil Nadu Co-Operative Societies

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-12-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 30639 of 2025 and WMP No. 45563 of 2025 V.Anand Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Secretary to Government...

Uncategorized

Madras HC directs filing representation before Customs – Justice Abdul Quddhose – Duty Drawback Scheme refunds customs/excise duties on exported goods inputs [1]

[23/12, 10:05] Sekarreporter: Exporter Seeks Manual Credit of Drawback Benefits after ICEGATE Portal Fails to Enable Credit: Madras HC Orders to file Representation before Customs [Read Order] https://share.google/2w0sI7VKENY43lXBz [23/12, 10:05] Meta AI: The Madras...

Uncategorized

The Supreme Court of India has clarified that occupying land for 12 years doesn’t automatically grant ownership rights. Adverse possession, a legal concept allowing ownership claims after continuous possession, requires strict proof, including hostile possession against the true owner. ¹

[23/12, 09:58] Meta AI: The Supreme Court of India has clarified that occupying land for 12 years doesn’t automatically grant ownership rights. Adverse possession, a legal concept allowing ownership claims after continuous possession, requires...

Uncategorized

Justice N. Sathish Kumar suggests forming a *federation* of villa and apartment owners – Necessary for maintaining shared common areas and facilities – Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership Act, 2022 applicability being examined [1]

The Madras High Court is considering a writ petition filed by M/s. Aqualily Home Owner’s Association, seeking to quash the District Registrar’s order returning their declaration (Form A) under the Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership...

Uncategorized

Justices B.V. Nagarathna and R. Mahadevan was hearing an appeal against an order of the Madurai Bench of the High Court, which had granted bail to the accused in an attempt to murder case without considering that they were also accused of murdering a key eyewitness while earlier on bail.

[23/12, 07:51] Sekarreporter: https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/manifestly-perverse-supreme-court-sets-aside-hc-order-granting-bail-to-accused-who-allegedly-murdered-witness-while-on-bail-514199 [23/12, 07:51] Sekarreporter: The Supreme Court set aside the Madras High Court’s order grant bail to the accused in a murder case, noting that the order granting bail was vitiated...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com