SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Courts Must Remain Alive To Distinction Between Commercial Gain & Hypothetical Accretion: Supreme Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/jindal-equipment-leasing-consultancy-services-ltd-v-commissioner-of-income-tax-2026-insc-46-1604091 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media

Uncategorized

Courts Must Remain Alive To Distinction Between Commercial Gain & Hypothetical Accretion: Supreme Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/jindal-equipment-leasing-consultancy-services-ltd-v-commissioner-of-income-tax-2026-insc-46-1604091 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-* https://www.verdictum.in/social-media

Courts Must Remain Alive To Distinction Between Commercial Gain & Hypothetical Accretion: Supreme Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/jindal-equipment-leasing-consultancy-services-ltd-v-commissioner-of-income-tax-2026-insc-46-1604091 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme Court & Other Legal Updates:-*...

Meta AI: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has approached the Supreme Court against West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, alleging that she obstructed their investigation and removed crucial evidence during raids at the office of political consultancy firm I-PAC and the residence of its director, Pratik Jain. The ED claims that Banerjee, with the help of police, forcibly took away digital devices, electronic storage media, and key incriminating documents from the agency’s custody. ¹ ² ³

Uncategorized

Meta AI: The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has approached the Supreme Court against West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, alleging that she obstructed their investigation and removed crucial evidence during raids at the office of political consultancy firm I-PAC and the residence of its director, Pratik Jain. The ED claims that Banerjee, with the help of police, forcibly took away digital devices, electronic storage media, and key incriminating documents from the agency’s custody. ¹ ² ³

[11/01, 10:11] Sekarreporter: https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/ed-approaches-supreme-court-after-calcutta-high-court-defers-hearing-in-i-pac-case-against-mamata-banerjee-2849788-2026-01-10 [11/01, 10:11] Meta AI: இ-பிஏசி வழக்கில் மாமதா பானர்ஜிக்கு எதிரான வழக்கில் கல்கத்தா உயர் நீதிமன்றம் விசாரணையை ஒத்திவைத்ததை தொடர்ந்து, அமலாக்கத்துறை உச்ச நீதிமன்றத்தை அணுகியுள்ளது. இ-பிஏசி அலுவலகத்தில் சோதனை நடத்தியபோது முக்கிய ஆவணங்களை எடுத்துச் சென்றதாக கூறப்படும் குற்றச்சாட்டு...

Uncategorized

Sekarreporter: Key notes [11/01, 07:56] Meta AI: 📝 Key notes from the judgment: – Madras High Court quashed demands for surface compensation raised under Section 72 of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960. – Demands deemed arbitrary, unilateral, and incorrect in law. – 32 matters disposed of, including 19 Writ Appeals and 13 Writ Petitions. – Judgment delivered by Justice Anita Sumanth and Justice C. Kumarappan. – Attachments, if any, to be raised. – No costs imposed.

[11/01, 07:29] Sekarreporter: “The impugned demands, are also, for the above reasons, arbitrary, unilateral and incorrect in law, and we quash the same. Consequently, attachments, if any, will stand raised. 75. In light of...

Uncategorized

Quashed HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WA.Nos.1228, 312, 1291, 310, 313, 314 & 315 of 2023 and WA.Nos.432, 623, 433, 862, 757 & 624 of 2020 and

2025:MHC:2296 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on: 30.04.2025 Pronounced on : 10.09.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICEANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WA.Nos.1228, 312, 1291, 310, 313, 314 &...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com