SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has criticized the CB-CID for failing to arrest S Krishnakumari, a suspended sub-inspector and mother of the accused,

[14/01, 09:01] Sekarreporter: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Madurai/caste-killing-of-techie-hc-criticises-cb-cid-for-failure-to-arrest-accused/article70506050.ece [14/01, 09:01] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has criticized the CB-CID for failing to arrest S Krishnakumari, a suspended sub-inspector and mother of the accused, in the Kavin Selvaganesh...

Uncategorized

Justice L Victoria Gowri dismissed Krishnakumari’s petition seeking direction to the trial court to hear her application to recall the non-bailable warrant issued against her. The court emphasized the need for transparency and rigour in investigation, particularly in grave offences with SC/ST Act implications.

[14/01, 08:53] Sekarreporter: ” NATION WORLD STATES OPINION CITIES BUSINESS SPORT GOOD NEWS MOVIES LIFESTYLE VIDEOS WEB SCRAWL Advertisement Tamil Nadu Madras HC faults CB-CID for not arresting SI-mom in Kavin murder case In...

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the CESTAT’s rejection of a limitation plea raised by Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd (MEPP) under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The appellant, engaged in fabrication, was issued a Show Cause Notice in 2000 for allegedly floating shadow units to evade excise duty. The court noted that the limitation plea was raised for the first time before the Tribunal without supporting facts. Since the issue involved a mixed question of law and fact, and necessary factual material was lacking, the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the plea. The court concluded that the extended limitation period was correctly invoked, and the appeal was dismissed [1]. Key points: – MEPP allegedly floated shadow units to evade excise duty (1995-96) – Limitation plea raised for the first time before CESTAT without facts – Madras HC upheld CESTAT’s rejection of the plea – Appeal dismissed, with no order as to costs https://www.sekarreporter.com/meta-ai-the-madras-high-court-has-upheld-the-cestats-rejection-of-a-limitation-plea-raised-by-modern-engineering-plastics-pvt-ltd-mepp-under-section-11a-of-the-central-excise-act-the-appellant/

Uncategorized

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the CESTAT’s rejection of a limitation plea raised by Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd (MEPP) under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The appellant, engaged in fabrication, was issued a Show Cause Notice in 2000 for allegedly floating shadow units to evade excise duty. The court noted that the limitation plea was raised for the first time before the Tribunal without supporting facts. Since the issue involved a mixed question of law and fact, and necessary factual material was lacking, the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the plea. The court concluded that the extended limitation period was correctly invoked, and the appeal was dismissed [1]. Key points: – MEPP allegedly floated shadow units to evade excise duty (1995-96) – Limitation plea raised for the first time before CESTAT without facts – Madras HC upheld CESTAT’s rejection of the plea – Appeal dismissed, with no order as to costs https://www.sekarreporter.com/meta-ai-the-madras-high-court-has-upheld-the-cestats-rejection-of-a-limitation-plea-raised-by-modern-engineering-plastics-pvt-ltd-mepp-under-section-11a-of-the-central-excise-act-the-appellant/

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the CESTAT’s rejection of a limitation plea raised by Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd (MEPP) under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The appellant,...

Uncategorized

Justice P T Asha emphasized the urgency of the situation, stating that the delay in decision-making could have irreversible consequences. The court has asked the authorities to consider the request positively and take a decision as soon as an organ becomes available. ¹

[14/01, 08:04] Sekarreporter: https://indianexpress.com/article/legal-news/madras-high-court-directs-authorities-to-decide-dual-lung-allocation-for-critically-ill-patient-in-3-days-10470194/ [14/01, 08:04] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has directed the National Organ and Tissue Transplant Organization (NOTTO) and the Transplant Authority Government of Tamil Nadu (TRANSTAN) to decide on...

Uncategorized

Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the CESTAT’s rejection of a limitation plea raised by Modern Engineering & Plastics Pvt Ltd (MEPP) under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The appellant, engaged in fabrication, was issued a Show Cause Notice in 2000 for allegedly floating shadow units to evade excise duty. The court noted that the limitation plea was raised for the first time before the Tribunal without supporting facts. Since the issue involved a mixed question of law and fact, and necessary factual material was lacking, the Tribunal was justified in rejecting the plea. The court concluded that the extended limitation period was correctly invoked, and the appeal was dismissed [1]. Key points: – MEPP allegedly floated shadow units to evade excise duty (1995-96) – Limitation plea raised for the first time before CESTAT without facts – Madras HC upheld CESTAT’s rejection of the plea – Appeal dismissed, with no order as to costs

[14/01, 07:56] Sekarreporter: “The Madras High Court has upheld the Customs and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (CESTAT) rejection of a limitation plea that was raised for the first time before it, under Section 11Aof...

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court has upheld the Centre’s decision to extend the tenure of the Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI) on a one-year contract. The court accepted the government’s explanation that the extension was a stop-gap arrangement while recruitment rules are being reworked. The DCGI’s continuation was challenged, but the court ruled that the process followed was legally sound, emphasizing that the appointee’s eligibility and qualifications were never in question. ¹

[14/01, 07:50] Sekarreporter: Madras HC Upholds Centre’s One-Year Contract Extension of DCGI https://medicaldialogues.in/news/industry/pharma/madras-hc-upholds-centres-one-year-contract-extension-of-dcgi-162610 [14/01, 07:50] Meta AI: The Madras High Court has upheld the Centre’s decision to extend the tenure of the Drugs Controller...

Uncategorized

Rape charge falls after Madras High Court finds no mention of ‘signs and gestures’ in deaf and mute survivor’s statement Rape charge falls after Madras High Court finds no mention of ‘signs and gestures’ in deaf and mute survivor’s statement Deaf mute survivor case: Justice M Nirmal Kumar was hearing an appeal by a man against a trial court verdict convicting him for rape of a 20-year-old deaf and mute woman in 2018 and reduced his sentence from the offence of rape to cheating.”

[13/01, 19:23] Sekarreporter: “ome ePaper India UPSC Premium Entertainment Politics Sports World Explained Opinion Business Chennai Lifestyle Tech NewsLegalRape charge falls after Madras High Court finds no mention of ‘signs and gestures’ in deaf...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com