SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma said that in this case, while the Lok Sabha Speaker admitted the motion, the same was not done in the Rajya Sabha. The Court said that the provisions of the 1968 Act can’t be read in a manner which makes the admitted motion in one House otiose. 

Additional Solicitor General of India, Raja Thakare, has been appointed to assist the three-member Inquiry Committee constituted as a part of impeachment proceedings against Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court. The Ministry of Law and...

Uncategorized

Justices P Velmurugan and M Jothiraman. During the hearing, Rayer tendered an unconditional apology and stated that he was ready to pay the fine amount. Recording the same, the Division Bench closed the appeal.”

[18/01, 07:38] Sekarreporter: “While hearing the matter, Justice CV Karthikeyan held that a contempt petition cannot be filed in such a manner against a judicial officer and that the case was not maintainable. Accordingly,...

“Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, while relying on the Apex Court’s ruling in Rajasthan High Court v. Rajat Yadav (2025), reiterated that “a candidate belonging to reserve category who has scored marks higher than the cut off marks for the General Category is to be treated as having qualified against an open or unreserved vacant post”.” https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/airports-authority-of-india-ors-v-sham-krishna-b-ors-2026-insc-69-1604709#:~:text=Justice%20M.M.%20Sundresh%20and,open%20or%20unreserved%20vacant%20post%E2%80%9D.

Uncategorized

“Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, while relying on the Apex Court’s ruling in Rajasthan High Court v. Rajat Yadav (2025), reiterated that “a candidate belonging to reserve category who has scored marks higher than the cut off marks for the General Category is to be treated as having qualified against an open or unreserved vacant post”.” https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/airports-authority-of-india-ors-v-sham-krishna-b-ors-2026-insc-69-1604709#:~:text=Justice%20M.M.%20Sundresh%20and,open%20or%20unreserved%20vacant%20post%E2%80%9D.

Ó”Justice M.M. Sundresh and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, while relying on the Apex Court’s ruling in Rajasthan High Court v. Rajat Yadav (2025), reiterated that “a candidate belonging to reserve category who has scored...

Reserved Category Candidate Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must Be Treated As Qualified Against Open Or Unreserved Vacancies: Supreme Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/airports-authority-of-india-ors-v-sham-krishna-b-ors-2026-insc-69-1604709

Uncategorized

Reserved Category Candidate Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must Be Treated As Qualified Against Open Or Unreserved Vacancies: Supreme Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/airports-authority-of-india-ors-v-sham-krishna-b-ors-2026-insc-69-1604709

Reserved Category Candidate Scoring Above General Cut-Off Must Be Treated As Qualified Against Open Or Unreserved Vacancies: Supreme Court https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/airports-authority-of-india-ors-v-sham-krishna-b-ors-2026-insc-69-1604709 *Follow India’s No.1 Free Legal News Website To Get All Judgements Of The Supreme...

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com