SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 4, 2026

Don’t issue work order for ECR elevated corridor, orders Madras High Court Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan pass the interim order on a writ appeal filed by a disqualified bidder

[04/02, 07:52] Sekarreporter: ” HOME NEWS INDIA TAMIL NADU Don’t issue work order for ECR elevated corridor, orders Madras High Court Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G. Arul Murugan pass the interim...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 4, 2026

Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy has ordered notice in the plea.  The plea states that RSS camps are foundational for its structure, transforming volunteers into disciplined members committed nationalist vision

Sri Saraswati Vidyalaya has approached the Madras High Court challenging a show cause notice issued by the Directorate of School Education (Private Schools) for allowing the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) to conduct their Seva...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 3, 2026

The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 3rd February, 2026 has approved the proposal for appointment of the following retired Judges as ad hoc Judges of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in terms of Article 224-A of the Constitution of India, for a period of two years:

[03/02, 21:31] Sekarreporter: Allahabath hc [03/02, 21:42] Sekarreporter: STATEMENT The Supreme Court Collegium in its meeting held on 3rd February, 2026 has approved the proposal for appointment of the following retired Judges as ad...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 3, 2026

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the statement made on affidavit by the appellant that the difference in the financial bid submitted by the appellant and L1 is more than Rs.600 crore, we direct that respondent Nos.1 to 3 shall not issue work order till the next date of hearing. 4.          This order shall not come in the way of the respondent authorities in communicating the reasons for rejection of the technical bid of the appellant and, upon such communication, seeking early disposal of this appeal. List this appeal on 12.2.2026. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA,CJ)      (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)                  03.02.2026       sasi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.A.No.284 of 2026 and C.M.P.No.2589 of 2026 Dilip Buildcon...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Uncategorized

 by · Published February 3, 2026

Justice P Velmurugan and Justice M Jothiraman directed the Additional Public Prosecutor and the counsel Ragavachary senior advt representing Shankar’s mother Kamala to file their response/objection to the Medical Board’s report.p

Live Law home-iconTop StoriesNews UpdatesColumnsInterviewsForeign/InternationalRTIKnow the LawLaw SchoolsLaw FirmsJob UpdatesBook ReviewsEvents CornerVideosSponsoredContact UsAdvertise with UsRound UpsIBC NewsEnvironmental LawCartoonsTaxArbitrationConsumer Cases Home > High Courts > Madras High Court > Madras High Court Asks… Madras High...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version