SEKAR REPORTER

Court News from Madras High Court

SEKAR REPORTER Blog

Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad on Thursday. Tirunelveli-based advocate S. Veilumuthu had filed the case accusing the CMDA PRO of having disseminated to the media an election related political news through his official e-mail address.

Uncategorized

Chief Justice Sanjay V. Gangapurwala and Justice J. Sathya Narayana Prasad on Thursday. Tirunelveli-based advocate S. Veilumuthu had filed the case accusing the CMDA PRO of having disseminated to the media an election related political news through his official e-mail address.

[18/04, 13:02] sekarreporter1: https://youtu.be/z7hlh5-KnKQ?si=J-6mcbv8VsByf8tH[18/04, 13:05] sekarreporter1: “Read in App HOMENEWSINDIATAMIL NADUPlea in HC alleges violation of model code of conduct by CMDA PROApril 17, 2024 11:20 pm | Updated 11:20 pm IST – CHENNAI...

Thiru.Dayanidhi Maran, (Male/Age 57 Yrs)S/o Late Thiru. Murasoli MaranNo.3, First Avenue,Boat Club Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai-600028 …Complainant-Vs- Edapadi.palanisamy /complaint copy/

Uncategorized

Thiru.Dayanidhi Maran, (Male/Age 57 Yrs)S/o Late Thiru. Murasoli MaranNo.3, First Avenue,Boat Club Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai-600028 …Complainant-Vs- Edapadi.palanisamy /complaint copy/

M/s R.VIVEKANANDANM.A.VIMAL MOHANSENTHIL MURUGAN IN THE COURT OF HONOURABLE XIII METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE,AT EGMORE, CHENNAI C.C.No. of 2024 Thiru.Dayanidhi Maran, (Male/Age 57 Yrs)S/o Late Thiru. Murasoli MaranNo.3, First Avenue,Boat Club Raja Annamalaipuram,Chennai-600028 …Complainant-Vs- Edapaddi K.Palanisami...

today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993

Uncategorized

today 9 law tips Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge made or entered in writing , it should necessarily contain reasons ( Rule 12 ( 4) debt recovery tribunal ( procedure ) rules 1993

[18/04, 10:39] Vinothpandian: 2017 (2) DRTC 56 : naveed Ahmed vs koppa & another : An order being an authoritative direction , injunction or mandate , it is decision of a court or judge...

வாக்காளர்களுக்கு எந்த வகையில் லஞ்சம் கொடுத்தாலும், அது அரசியலமைப்பு, ஜனநாயகத்தின் கட்டமைப்பை தகர்த்துவிடும் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளை judge pugalenthi எச்சரிக்கை/ mukesh reporter

Uncategorized

வாக்காளர்களுக்கு எந்த வகையில் லஞ்சம் கொடுத்தாலும், அது அரசியலமைப்பு, ஜனநாயகத்தின் கட்டமைப்பை தகர்த்துவிடும் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளை judge pugalenthi எச்சரிக்கை/ mukesh reporter

வாக்காளர்களுக்கு எந்த வகையில் லஞ்சம் கொடுத்தாலும், அது அரசியலமைப்பு, ஜனநாயகத்தின் கட்டமைப்பை தகர்த்துவிடும் என உயர் நீதிமன்ற மதுரைக் கிளை எச்சரிக்கை 2019ல் நாடாளுமன்றத் தேர்தல், 2021 சட்டமன்றத் தேர்தல் ஆகியவற்றில் வாக்காளர்களுக்கு பணம் கொடுத்ததற்காக எத்தனை வழக்குகள் பதிவு – நீதிபதி B.புகழேந்தி கேள்வி அவற்றின்...

The Madras High Court recently held that consuming alcohol during day is not an offence and a person involved in a motor accident cannot be held guilty without assessing the percentage of alcohol in his or her blood. 

Uncategorized

The Madras High Court recently held that consuming alcohol during day is not an offence and a person involved in a motor accident cannot be held guilty without assessing the percentage of alcohol in his or her blood. 

News Consuming alcohol during day not offence: Madras High Court sets aside contributory negligence deduction in MACT award Justice Anand Venkatesh also directed the TN government to make it mandatory for doctors examining road...

Chief justice bench dismissed batch of cases /For Petitioners : Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel for Mr.Anand Gopalan, T.S.Gopalan & Co.For Respondent No.1 : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor-Generalassisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan, Deputy Solicitor-GeneralFor Respondents 2, 3 : Mr.G.Ilangovan, SPCFor Respondents 4-6,8 : Ms.E.Maragatha SundariFor Respondent No.7 : No appearanceCOMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.All these writ petitions have been filed challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act (Act 6/2016).

Uncategorized

Chief justice bench dismissed batch of cases /For Petitioners : Mr.A.L.Somayaji, Senior Counsel for Mr.Anand Gopalan, T.S.Gopalan & Co.For Respondent No.1 : Mr.AR.L.Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor-Generalassisted by Mr.Rajesh Vivekanandan, Deputy Solicitor-GeneralFor Respondents 2, 3 : Mr.G.Ilangovan, SPCFor Respondents 4-6,8 : Ms.E.Maragatha SundariFor Respondent No.7 : No appearanceCOMMON ORDER D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.All these writ petitions have been filed challenging the constitutional validity of the Payment of Bonus (Amendment) Act (Act 6/2016).

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASReserved on :: 22.03.2024Delivered on :: 12.04.2024CORAMTHE HON’BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICEANDTHE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHYWP Nos.6958, 8930, 8946, 8947, 8948,9007, 10336, 10337, 11013, 12334, 12483,13212, 15575,...

Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed and the conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellants/A1 to A5 in S.C. No.60 of 2018 dated 31.01.2020, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases, Coimbatore, are set aside. Appellants/A1 to A5 are acquitted of all the charges and are directed to be released forthwith unless their presence is required in connection with any other case. The fine amounts, if any, paid by the appellants shall be refunded. Bail bonds, if any, executed shall stand discharged. Consequently, the connected CriminalMiscellaneous Petition is closed. (M.S.R.,J.) (S.M.,J.)16.04.2024

Uncategorized

Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is allowed and the conviction and sentence imposed upon the appellants/A1 to A5 in S.C. No.60 of 2018 dated 31.01.2020, on the file of the learned Sessions Judge, Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases, Coimbatore, are set aside. Appellants/A1 to A5 are acquitted of all the charges and are directed to be released forthwith unless their presence is required in connection with any other case. The fine amounts, if any, paid by the appellants shall be refunded. Bail bonds, if any, executed shall stand discharged. Consequently, the connected CriminalMiscellaneous Petition is closed. (M.S.R.,J.) (S.M.,J.)16.04.2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON : 08.04.2024PRONOUNCED ON : 16.04.2024CORAM :THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESHANDTHE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHANCrl.A.No.123 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.No.13673 of 2023

In response, the music composer’s counsel-on-record A. Saravanan said, the senior counsel had made the statement only in the context of copyright and to assert Mr. Ilaiyaraaja’s right over songs composed by him since Echo Recording Private Limited had questioned this right

Uncategorized

In response, the music composer’s counsel-on-record A. Saravanan said, the senior counsel had made the statement only in the context of copyright and to assert Mr. Ilaiyaraaja’s right over songs composed by him since Echo Recording Private Limited had questioned this right

17/04, 19:06] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1780590932804739296?t=SvA7pSur3HJvYOcqeVRZYQ&s=08[17/04, 19:06] sekarreporter1: “ [17/04, 19:06] sekarreporter1: https://x.com/sekarreporter1/status/1780590932804739296?t=SvA7pSur3HJvYOcqeVRZYQ&s=08[17/04, 19:06] sekarreporter1: “Music maestro Ilaiyaraaja. File photograph | Photo Credit: R. Ragu The musical trinity, Muthuswami Deekshitar, Tyagarajar and Syama Sastri can claim...