SEKAR REPORTER Blog

court relied on the decision in K.Uma’s case, which held that the G.O. needs to be given a liberal interpretation, and there cannot be any ceiling on the strength of teachers as it varies with student strength. The State had accepted this interpretation in subsequent matters.

The Madras High Court has ruled that the post of Physical Education Director should be over and above the three posts of Physical Education Teachers, as per G.O.Ms.No.525 dated 29.12.1977. The court dismissed the...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

there is some merit in the argument that, if at all the subsequent Bench, which had heard St.Mary’s case, differed with the opinion expressed in K.Uma’s case, reference to the Larger Bench ought to have been made at that stage. 28. We, in fact, concerned with the decision in K.Uma’s case and the question of any reference to a Larger Bench at our instance does not

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.11.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.A(MD)No.2568 of 2025 and C.M.P(MD)No.14662 of 2025 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

By Advocate M/s. M.Ravi Vs. 1.Union of India, Rep by Chairman, Railway Recruitment Board – Chennai, 5, Dr.P.V. Cherian Crescent Road, Egmore, Chennai 600008. 2.The Principal Chief Personnel Officer, Headquarters Office, Southern Railway, Chennai 600003. 3.Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Divisional Office, Chennai Division, Southern Railway, Chennai 600003.

[19/02, 07:10] sekarreporter1: CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH OA/310/00032/2023 Dated this, the 3rd day of February Two Thousand Twenty Six CORAM : HON’BLE MS. VEENA KOTHAVALE, Member (J) HON’BLE MR. SISIR KUMAR RATHO, Member...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

OA allowed order setaside CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH OA/310/00032/2023 Dated this, the 3rd day of February Two Thousand Twenty Six CORAM : HON’BLE MS. VEENA KOTHAVALE, Member (J) HON’BLE MR. SISIR KUMAR RATHO, Member (A) 1. V.L.Kingston, 2. Lionel. S. R., 3. Chinnasamy. /,for petner advocate M Ravi

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH OA/310/00032/2023 Dated this, the 3rd day of February Two Thousand Twenty Six CORAM : HON’BLE MS. VEENA KOTHAVALE, Member (J) HON’BLE MR. SISIR KUMAR RATHO, Member (A) 1. V.L.Kingston,...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
Bombay bar association Farewell tea-party in the in the honor of Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite-Dare, on her appointment as Chief Justice Of the Meghalaya High Court Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mahesh Sonak, on his appointment as Chief Justice Of the Jharkhand High Court On:

Bombay bar association Farewell tea-party in the in the honor of Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite-Dare, on her appointment as Chief Justice Of the Meghalaya High Court Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mahesh Sonak, on his appointment as Chief Justice Of the Jharkhand High Court On:

[18/02, 20:39] sekarreporter1:       [18/02, 20:39] sekarreporter1: Farewell tea-party in the in the honor of Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite-Dare, on her appointment as Chief Justice Of the Meghalaya High Court Hon’ble...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
https://x.com/i/status/2024126722958872677      [18/02, 20:13] sekarreporter1: TMC MP Sagarika Ghose hit out at the Election Commission (EC) alleging that leaked chats reveal that the EC bypassed Supreme Court-mandated procedures. She claimed orders were issued

https://x.com/i/status/2024126722958872677 [18/02, 20:13] sekarreporter1: TMC MP Sagarika Ghose hit out at the Election Commission (EC) alleging that leaked chats reveal that the EC bypassed Supreme Court-mandated procedures. She claimed orders were issued

[18/02, 20:12] sekarreporter1:     https://x.com/i/status/2024126722958872677   [18/02, 20:13] sekarreporter1: TMC MP Sagarika Ghose hit out at the Election Commission (EC) alleging that leaked chats reveal that the EC bypassed Supreme Court-mandated procedures. She...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare

Justice N Anand Venkatesh described such clauses as “unlawful on the face of it”. – The Court asked if hospitals are running a business or a hospital. – The case involves MIOT Hospitals’ petition against Dr Balaraman Palaniappan.

[18/02, 19:23] sekarreporter1: [18/02, 19:22] sekarreporter1: https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/are-you-running-a-business-or-a-hospital-madras-high-court-slams-non-compete-clauses-in-doctor-contracts [18/02, 19:22] sekarreporter1: Are you running a business or a hospital? Madras High Court slams non-compete clauses in doctor contracts The Court said that such restrictive covenants...

FacebookTwitterEmailBloggerGmailLinkedInWhatsAppPinterestTumblrShare
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com
Exit mobile version