Follow:
- Next story Centre, judiciary break ice over appointment of HC, SC judges
- Previous story Local body election case full order video camara case v Parthiban judge order PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to count the votes of one Panchayat out of 14 Panchayats at one time for the Ward No.19 of Salem District Panchayat, to declare the results of the said Panchayats and thereafter to start the counting of votes of other Panchayats similarly and consequently direct the respondents to permit a Committee of persons including the petitioner, the candidates for Panchayat Union Ward members, Salem District, the candidates for the Village Panchayat President, the candidates for the Village Panchayat Ward Member, the election agent and the counting agents to be present for the opening of the ballot boxes, the counting of votes and the declaration of results. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Selvaraj For Respondents :Mr.A.R.L.Sundaresan, Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr.B.Neduncheziyan for RR1 Mr.S.R.Rajagopal, AAG assisted by Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayan, GP and Mr.V.Shanmuga Sundaram, Spl.GP for R2 Mrs.Narmadha Sampath, AAG for Mr.E.Balamurugan for RR3 & 4 COMMON ORDER
Recent Posts
- These intermediaries say that they have been left out of the recent clarification by the government and that they will continue their legal battle across high courts. The main
- Why Madras HC’s Ruling on Digital Intermediaries Is SignificantThe order assumes importance by highlighting one of the primary tests which could be used to reveal the unconstitutionality of the rules under Part II.24 hours ago | Smitha Krishna Prasad and Madhavi
- bench of Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant observed that it is not expected to act mechanically merely to deliver a purported dispute raised by an applicant at the doors of the chosen Arbitrator.
- Section 34 of the Arbitration Act stipulates that any person aggrieved by an arbitral award can file an application seeking setting aside of the arbitral award in terms of Sections
- Justice SM Subramaniam observed, ” Fraudulent and illegal encroachments of temple properties is a crime against the society at large. Misappropriation of the funds of the temple is
More
Recent Posts
- These intermediaries say that they have been left out of the recent clarification by the government and that they will continue their legal battle across high courts. The main
- Why Madras HC’s Ruling on Digital Intermediaries Is SignificantThe order assumes importance by highlighting one of the primary tests which could be used to reveal the unconstitutionality of the rules under Part II.24 hours ago | Smitha Krishna Prasad and Madhavi
- bench of Chief Justice of India NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant observed that it is not expected to act mechanically merely to deliver a purported dispute raised by an applicant at the doors of the chosen Arbitrator.
- Section 34 of the Arbitration Act stipulates that any person aggrieved by an arbitral award can file an application seeking setting aside of the arbitral award in terms of Sections
- Justice SM Subramaniam observed, ” Fraudulent and illegal encroachments of temple properties is a crime against the society at large. Misappropriation of the funds of the temple is
