Order passed by justice Anand Venkatesh in a case relating to changing the name in Patta by RDO, High Court has held that, RDO has acted as original authority and without following the ealier order’s passed by Thasildar on two occasion and the order’s passed by the High CourtCase relating to Crome Leather Company at Crompet full.order

.pdf

[8/30, 09:01] Sekarreporter 1: [8/30, 09:00] Sekarreporter 1: https://twitter.com/sekarreporter1/status/1299912386338459650?s=08
[8/30, 09:01] Sekarreporter 1: [8/30, 08:58] Sekarreporter 1: [8/30, 08:54] N. Senthil Kumar Advocate: Order passed by justice Anand Venkatesh in a case relating to changing the name in Patta by RDO, High Court has held that, RDO has acted as original authority and without following the ealier order’s passed by Thasildar on two occasion and the order’s passed by the High Court.-14736″ />
[8/30, 08:56] Sekarreporter 1:
[8/30, 08:57] N. Senthil Kumar Advocate: Case relating to Crome Leather Company at Crompet
[8/30, 08:58] Sekarreporter 1: [8/30, 08:56] Sekarreporter 1:
[8/30, 08:56] Sekarreporter 1: 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Reserved on : 20.08.2020
Pronounced on : 24.08.2020
CORAM
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.No.9595 of 2020
and W.M.P.Nos.11720 & 11721 of 2020
M/s.The Chrome Leather company Ltd
Rep. by its Vice President Mr.Vairakumar
No.7 works Road Chrompet ,
Chennai 600 044. … Petitioner
-Vs-
1.The Revenue Divisional officer
Tambaram Chennai.
2. Quenti Dawson
3. Dhamodharan
4. David Chamber … Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India,
praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari Calling for the
records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st
respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.705/2018/ A dated
12/07/2019 and quash the same as illegal without Jurisdiction and
arbitrary.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.S.Krishnan, Senior Counsel
for Mr.N.Senthil Kumar
For Respondents : Mr.E.Balamurugan
Special Government Pleader – for R1
Mr.E.J.Ayyappan – for R2
http://www.judis.nic.in
[8/30, 09:44] Sekarreporter 1: 9
to pass the impugned order on a tangent. The order of the first
respondent is totally unsustainable since the first respondent has
decided the issue as if it is a dispute between the second
respondent and the third respondent. Surprisingly, the third
respondent has not even challenged the proceedings and that
speaks volumes about the collusion between the second respondent
and the third respondent. This Court does not want to use any
strong words against the first respondent, who is a statutory
authority, who has acted in a very questionable manner for
extraneous consideration.
15. This Court has absolutely no hesitation to interfere with
the impugned order passed by the first respondent and accordingly
the same is hereby quashed.
16. In the result, the Writ Petition is allowed. No costs.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
24.08.2020
Index : Yes/No
Internet : Yes/No
KST/LPP
To
The Revenue Divisional officer, Tambaram Chennai.
http://www.judis.nic.

You may also like...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call Now ButtonCALL ME